Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock

Decision Date14 March 1979
Docket NumberNo. B-8010,B-8010
PartiesHomer G. MAXEY et al., Petitioners, v. TEXAS COMMERCE BANK OF LUBBOCK, Texas, Respondent.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Simon & Simon, Harold D. Hammett and Mike Liles, Fort Worth, for petitioners.

Jones, Trout, Flygare & Moody, Charles B. Jones, Lubbock, Shafer, Gilliland, Davis, Bunton & McCollum, Inc., Perry Davis, Jr. and James M. O'Leary, Odessa, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court granted Homer G. Maxey and five other plaintiffs a judgment following a jury trial whereby they recovered substantial damages from Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock, Texas because of Bank's failure to exercise good faith in a private foreclosure sale of stock in plaintiffs' two closely held corporations. The court of civil appeals concluded that the jury's finding to the special issue inquiring as to the amount of the liabilities of Plaza Building Corporation at the time of the foreclosure sale was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial. 571 S.W.2d 39.

This Court does not have jurisdiction to pass upon the fact question of the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. Tippett v. Brannon, 493 S.W.2d 511 (Tex.1973). We therefore refuse the application for writ of error, no reversible error. In doing so, we express no opinion as to the correctness of the holding by the court of civil appeals that the award of prejudgment interest on the amount of actual damages recovered by plaintiffs is limited to the rate of six (6) percent per annum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Phillips Petroleum Company v. Shutts, 84-233
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1985
    ...Petroleum Co. v. Adams, 513 F.2d 355 (CA5), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 930, 96 S.Ct. 281, 46 L.Ed.2d 259 (1975); cf. Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank, 580 S.W.2d 340, 341 (Tex.1979). Moreover, at least one court interpreting Texas law appears to have held that Texas excuses inter- est liability onc......
  • Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Fiberglass Insulators, MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 20, 1986
    ...a holding on this subject because no issue was presented by the parties or confronted by the court. See also Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank, 580 S.W.2d 340 (Tex.1979) (an unsigned, per curiam opinion refusing a writ of error, n.r.e., and expressing "no opinion" regarding the lower court holdi......
  • Channel 20, Inc. v. World Wide Towers Services, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • May 6, 1985
    ...1980, writ dism'd w.o.j.); Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank, 571 S.W.2d 39, 50-51 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1978), writ ref'd per curiam, 580 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1979). The general rule is that prejudgment interest is recoverable as a matter of right when an ascertainable sum of money is determined t......
  • State Nat. Bank of El Paso v. Farah Mfg. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • August 29, 1984
    ...any damage sustained thereto. Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock, 571 S.W.2d 39 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1978), writ ref'd n.r.e. 580 S.W.2d 340 (1979). However, the evidence only supports deducting the proceeds from $1,300,670.00 and a verdict of $421,743.77 in response to special issu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT