Maxson v. Jennings
Decision Date | 09 December 1898 |
Citation | 48 S.W. 781 |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Parties | MAXSON v. JENNINGS.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
Allen, Watkins & Jones, for plaintiff in error. Ford, Stone & Ford and Hendricks & Hendricks, for defendant in error.
Defendant in error brought this action of trespass to try title to recover the land in controversy, known as "Spillman's Island," in San Jacinto Bay; alleging title generally, as well as by limitation under the three and five years' statutes. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and, specially, that he had title to 160 acres of the land sued for, by 10 years' limitation. The trial was before the judge without a jury, and judgment was rendered for plaintiff.
The original grant from the sovereignty, the validity of which is not questioned, was extended to Henry K. Lewis on the 8th day of November, 1830. From Lewis the plaintiff deraigned title as follows:
(1) Record from the county court of Austin county, showing the appointment of John W. Moore as curator of the estate of Henry K. Lewis, deceased, by a court not mentioned in the statement of facts; his qualification; the filing of inventory and appraisement; petition for order of sale of real and personal property, and report of sale of same. This is certified by the county clerk to be the whole of such record existing in his office. The dates of none of these proceedings are shown by the statement of facts, and it is not claimed that the sale referred to was of the land in controversy.
(2) Copy of an authentic act of sale, of date February 25, 1835, by John W. Moore, as curator of Henry K. Lewis, to James Spillman, conveying the land in controversy; reciting that it is made in compliance with a bond executed by Lewis in his lifetime, and in consideration of the payment to the curator of $160, receipt of which is acknowledged. This instrument also recites sale of other land of the estate, under orders of court, to Spillman, and conveys such other land. It was made before George Ewing, acting judge of first instance, and ex officio notary public in the town and jurisdiction of San Felipe de Austin, with the instrumental and assisting witnesses. It was acknowledged by Moore January 25, 1839, and recorded same day in Harris county.
(3) Proceedings in the administration of James Spillman through which the land was sold and conveyed by the administrator to Archibald Wynne on the 3d day of February, 1841. This deed was recorded July 28, 1852.
(4) Deed from Archibald Wynne to Frances Levenhagen, wife of Henry C. Levenhagen, of date June 9, 1842, recorded June 10, 1842.
(5) Deed from Henry Levenhagen and Frances Levenhagen to Robert Levenhagen, dated November 5, 1842, recorded November 9, 1842.
(6) Deed from Robert Levenhagen to Catherine Bowman, wife of Charles Bowman, for undivided one-third of land in controversy, dated August 29, 1843, recorded September 5, 1843, which deed recites the consideration to be "$400 in hand paid by Catherine Bowman, wife of Charles Bowman," and that the deed is made "with the previous consent of said Charles Bowman," her husband.
(7) The following deed:
This deed was recorded March 10, 1849.
(8) Proceedings in the county court of Harris county in the estate of Robert Levenhagen, deceased, showing the regular appointment of Henry Levenhagen as administrator of such estate; also, that on the 1st day of October, 1847, the following petition was filed in the proceedings:
On same day the administrator made to such petition the following answer:
Upon which the following order was made by the probate court: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Peveto v. Richardson
...it all necessary facts to support the judgment, where the record does not affirmatively show to the contrary. Maxson v. Jennings, 19 Tex. Civ. App. 700, 48 S. W. 781, 784; Dutton et al. v. Wright et al., 38 Tex. Civ. App. 372, 85 S. W. 1025; Houston v. Killough, 80 Tex. 296, 16 S. W. 56; Ba......
-
Moses v. Chapman
...Fulkerson v. Holmes, 6 S. Ct. 780, 117 U. S. 389, 29 L. Ed. 915; Ardoin v. Cobb (Tex. Civ. App.) 136 S. W. 271; Maxson v. Jennings, 48 S. W. 781, 19 Tex. Civ. App. 700; Fielder v. Pemberton, 189 S. W. 873, 136 Tenn. 440, Ann. Cas. 1918E, 905. The purpose for which such documents, classed as......
- Grinnan v. Rousseaux
- Grinnan v. Rousseaux