Maxwell v. Guyton

Decision Date01 January 1857
Citation20 Tex. 202
PartiesWILLIAM MAXWELL AND OTHERS v. MORGAN AND GUYTON.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

That the heirs of the mother's community interest have been advanced by, and have inherited from, the father, to the extent of the value of their inheritance from their mother, is a good defense to a suit by such heirs to recover their mother's community interest in property disposed of by the father after her decease; and see this case for testimony which was held to be sufficient to sustain a verdict for the defendant in such suit. 15 Tex. 519;28 Tex. 383.

Appeal from Washington. Tried below before the Hon. R. E. B. Baylor. The facts are stated in the opinion.

White, for appellants.

Lewis & Davis, for appellees.

HEMPHILL, CH. J.

This suit is by two daughters (joined by their husbands) of Amelia Stephenson, deceased, wife of James Stephenson, their father, to recover land claimed by them in the community right of their mother, and which after her death was sold by their father, who had also departed this life before the commencement of suit. There is some conflict of evidence, a variety of details, and an accumulation of conveyances, which tend to perplexity and confusion. But the main facts are, that the land sued for was purchased by Stephenson in 1835, during the life of his wife Amelia, by exchanging one quarter of his own headright league for this land, which was one quarter of a league of the headright of Isaac Jackson. Shortly afterwards, and before the death of his wife, he exchanged another portion of his headright for one quarter of a league belonging to Benjamin Babbit, situate in what is now known as Grimes county, to which Stephenson removed, and upon which he lived at the time of his death. His wife died in 1838; and one witness testifies that he sold a part of the land in suit in 1839 to one Hughes. No conveyance from this sale was offered in evidence; and the first conveyance of Stephenson to Morgan, one of the defendants, for 554 acres, was dated 5th January, 1847; a second conveyance, for another tract, to the same defendant, for 115 1/2 acres, was dated February 25th, 1849; and a third, for one hundred and ten acres, was dated February 15th, 1851. It was in proof that Morgan went into possession about 1844. The deed to the other defendant, Guyton, was for 289 acres, dated June 10th, 1851. There was no proof of possession by Guyton.

This suit was commenced 5th February, 1856.

Under the plea in defense, that the father of the plaintiffs had conveyed these lands with covenants of warranty, and that the plaintiffs had been advanced and had inherited property from his estate, exceeding in value their interests in the land claimed in this suit, it was shown that Stephenson at the death of his wife owned several tracts of land, one of which he afterwards sold; that he was not an energetic,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Burleson v. Burleson
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1866
    ...that course should be adopted. 15 Tex. 369 and 519, cited by the court; 18 id. 68; 20 id. 202; Pas. Dig. art. 4642, note 1049; 15 Tex. 519;20 Tex. 202. APPEAL from Lampasas. The case was tried before Hon. EDWARD H. VONTRESS, one of the district judges. The property involved covers the “Lamp......
  • Farquhar v. Dallas
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • January 1, 1857
  • Brown v. Elmendorf
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • May 28, 1894
    ...in error in holding that the defendants were bona fide purchasers of the parcels of property respectively claimed by them. In Maxwell v. Guyton, 20 Tex. 202, it was held that where the heirs of the father had received by advancement and by inheritance from him property equal in value to the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT