Maxwell v. State

Decision Date10 April 1912
Citation145 S.W. 1190
PartiesMAXWELL v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from Tarrant County Court; R. E. Bratton, Judge.

L. M. Maxwell was convicted of aggravated assault, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Parker & Hurley, of Ft. Worth, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

DAVIDSON, P. J.

The affidavit and information charge that appellant committed an aggravated assault upon E. S. Burns with "wire pliers," same being "a deadly weapon." The entire evidence in the record is from the witness Burns. This discloses that the witness was a conductor on the East Front line, part of the Traction Company lines of Ft. Worth, and he ordered the defendant from the car, because he was using bad language on the car, and that he would have to cut that out. Appellant said, if the witness would stop the car, he would get off. This was done. About an hour later they met at the end of the line, near the car barns, and as Burns stepped off the rear of the car he was struck from behind by some one. Further testifying, he said: "I turned around and saw the defendant. We then clinched. I think I was assaulted with a pair of `connecters,' but do not remember seeing any `wire pliers' in the possession of the defendant. I do remember seeing wire pliers taken off of one' of the defendants, L. M. Maxwell, T. C. Maxwell, or H. P. Coke, after their arrest. I will not swear that I was struck with wire pliers at all; will not swear that I was struck with any kind of metal. It might have been a baseball bat, or something like that. I don't know the length, breadth, or character of weapon that I was hit with, nor what material it was made of. After we clinched, I drew my pistol, and it was taken away from me by some one. Defendant's brother attacked me from behind, while I was fighting with defendant. I always carry a pistol on my person while I am at work on the street car. I did not begin the difficulty by drawing the pistol on defendant. I had several severe scalp wounds in my head, and felt the blood running down from behind."

This is the entire evidence in the record. The evidence does not show that Burns was struck with wire pliers, as charged in the complaint and information, and there is no evidence in the record with reference to whether the weapon was of a deadly character or not. On this question the evidence is absolutely silent. In this condition of the evidence, the conviction was not authorized.

Therefore the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Burrell v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 11, 1975
    ...alleged. Arbetter v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 487, 186 S.W. 769 (1916). See also McGee v. State, 5 Tex.App. 492 (1879); Maxwell v. State, 66 Tex.Cr.R. 258, 145 S.W. 1190 (1912). In Johnson v. State, 384 S.W.2d 885 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), it was held that an indictment for assault with intent to murde......
  • Berry v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1937
  • Davis v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 11, 1976
    ...unnecessary, must be proved substantially as alleged. Arbetter v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 487, 186 S.W. 769 (1916); Maxwell v. State, 66 Tex.Cr.R. 258, 145 S.W. 1190 (1912). Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 384 S.W.2d 885 (1964) held that an indictment for assault with intent to murder need not a......
  • Arbetter v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 24, 1916
    ...of it are a great number of cases collated by Mr. Branch. These begin with McGee v. State, 5 Tex. App. 492, and continue down to Maxwell v. State, 145 S. W. 1190. The allegation in both counts was that Maluf was struck with a pistol by appellant. The evidence excludes There is another quest......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT