Mayer v. National Missile & Electronics, Inc.
Decision Date | 10 January 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 18624.,18624. |
Citation | 326 F.2d 401 |
Parties | Jack R. MAYER and Jessie E. Mayer, Appellants, v. NATIONAL MISSILE AND ELECTRONICS, INC., Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Julius A. Leetham, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Robert G. Leff, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
As long ago as 1915, in an opinion by Judge Morrow in Hamilton Trust Co. v. Cornucopia Mines Co., 9 Cir., 223 F. 494, this court stated:
* * *"
The principles laid down by Judge Morrow are applicable here. The contest here is between a judgment creditor of the debtors and the holder of a mortgage upon their home, in which it is conceded that the debtors have no equity. The debtors appeal from an order that favors the judgment creditor. It is agreed that, if the order is reversed, the mortgagee, not the debtors, will be benefited. Yet the debtors are the appellants, not the mortgagee. The debtors, however, are not aggrieved.
Dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Wayne County
... ... Joseph H. Munson Company, Inc., --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2839, 2846 n. 4, 81 L.Ed.2d 786 ... Libby, McNeill, and Libby v. City National Bank, 592 F.2d 504, 511 (9th Cir.1978); Milonas v ... Company, 654 F.2d 1337, 1343 (9th Cir.1981); Mayer v. National Missile ... Page 694 ... and Electronics, ... ...
-
Libby, McNeill, and Libby v. City Nat. Bank
...the outcome of the appeal can have absolutely no effect on the interests of the appellant. Cf., e. g., Mayer v. Nat'l Missile and Elecs., Inc., 326 F.2d 401, 402 (9th Cir. 1964) (debtors who have no equity in home have no appealable interest where contest is solely between judgment creditor......
-
S.E.C. v. Securities Northwest, Inc.
...is remote and consequential rather than direct and immediate; he thus lacks standing to maintain the appeal. 9 Mayer v. National Missile and Electronics, Inc., supra; Skelton v. Clements, 408 F.2d 353 (9th Cir. 1969); Rogers v. Bank of America Nat'l Trust & Savings Ass'n, 142 F.2d 128 (9th ......
-
Blassie v. Kroger Company
...Bldg. Corp., 117 F.2d 191, 193 (7 Cir. 1941); Fuqua v. Bidwell, 281 F.2d 753, 754 (6 Cir. 1960); Mayer v. National Missile & Electronics, Inc., 326 F.2d 401, 402 (9 Cir. 1964). Our general approach. We recognize that the Supreme Court, in Arroyo v. United States, supra, at p. 424 of 359 U.S......