Mayers v. State
| Decision Date | 22 February 1905 |
| Citation | 85 S.W. 802 |
| Parties | MAYERS v. STATE. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Erath County; W. J. Oxford, Judge.
H. A. Mayers was convicted of crime, and he appeals. Reversed.
Nugent & Carter, for appellant. F. H. Chandler, Dist. Atty., and Howard Martin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years; hence this appeal.
An examination of the indictment discloses that it is insufficient. The pleader attempted to set out the alleged forged instrument according to its purport and tenor. In the purport clause the instrument is charged to be the act of Gay Simpson. When the instrument is set out according to its tenor, it appears to be signed by Mayers and Simpson. This is a variance, according to the authorities, between the purport and tenor clauses, and is fatal to the indictment. Campbell v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 32 S. W. 899; Fite v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 34 S. W. 921; Stephens v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 37 S. W. 425; Gibbons v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 37 S. W. 861; Crayton v. State, 7 Tex. Ct. Rep. 973, 73 S. W. 1046. It is not necessary to discuss other propositions.
Because the indictment is insufficient, the judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Nickols
... ... Barrett, Atty. Gen., and George O. Hebel, State's Atty., of Aledo, for the People.SMITH, Justice.This is a writ of error to review a judgment of the circuit court of Mercer county. The record ... 91;State v. Houseal, 2 Brev. 219, 4 S.C.L. 219; State v. Shawley, 5 Hayw., Tenn., 256; Tracy v. State, 49 Tex.Cr.R. 37, 90 S.W. 308;Mayers v. State, 47 Tex.Cr.R. 624, 85 S.W. 802;Evans v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 179, 135 S.W.2d 121;Simms v. State, 116 Tex.Cr.R. 97, 32 S.W.2d 852;State v ... ...
- Wesley v. State