Mayes v. Lane
Citation | 76 S.W. 399,116 Ky. 566 |
Parties | MAYES ET AL. v. LANE ET AL. |
Decision Date | 28 October 1903 |
Court | Court of Appeals of Kentucky |
Appeal from Circuit Court, McCracken County.
"To be officially reported."
Action by A. C. Mayes and others against J. E. Lane and others. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed.
Hendrick & Miller, Wm. Marble, and Jno. C. Gates, for appellants.
Bloomfield & Crice, for appellee Katterjohn.
J. D Mocquot, for appellee Hart.
The Christian Church at Princeton burned, and the congregation desiring to rebuild it, entered into a contract with the appellee James E. Lane, a contractor, for that purpose. The contract price was $4,300, but it was reduced to $4,280. Article 4 of the contract reads as follows:
Those representing the church, being unwilling to rely upon Lane's obligation, required him to give a bond to secure the church, which he did, with George O. Hart and F. W. Katterjohn as sureties. The bond reads as follows:
Pursuant to the contract, Lane began the construction of the church. According to the claim of the representatives of the church and which is sustained by the evidence, Lane did not construct and complete the church according to the plans and specifications and terms of his contract. It will be observed that 85 per cent. of the contract price was to be paid upon the certificate of the architect as the work progressed, and 15 per cent. was to be paid in 10 days after the building was completed, providing the property was free from all liens or rights of liens for debts due or claimed to be due from the contractor. The 85 per cent. was paid before the building was completed. After the contractor had quit the work, but before the building was completed as required by the contract, the 15 per cent. was paid (less something...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prescott Nat. Bank v. Head
...South (Tenn. Ch.), 52 S.W. 463; Gamble v. Cuneo, 162 N.Y. 634, 57 N.E. 1110; Smith v. Molleson, 148 N.Y. 241, 42 N.E. 670; Mayes v. Lane, 116 Ky. 566, 76 S.W. 399. contract of suretyship and the principal contract will be reasonably construed, and the surety will not ordinarily be released ......
-
American Surety Co. of N.Y. v. Noe
...to December 11, 1929, the date of the $15,000 architect's certificate; thus bringing this case squarely within Mayes v. Lane, 116 Ky. 566, 76 S.W. 399, 25 Ky. Law Rep. 824; U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Trustees of Baptist Church, 102 S.W. 325, 31 Ky. Law Rep. 520, which were recognized b......
-
American Bonding Co. v. Pueblo Inv. Co.
... ... there for under a similar contract and bond. Mackenzie v ... Board of School Trustees, 72 Ind. 189, 196; Mayes v ... Lane (Ky.) 76 S.W. 399, 400. Which is the true ... construction? ... Counsel ... call attention to the stipulations in the lease ... ...
-
Seaboard Sur. Co. v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.
...for materials furnished. Pacific States Electric Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 109 Cal.App. 691, 293 P. 812;Mayes v. Lane, 116 Ky. 566, 76 S.W. 399;Closson v. Billman, 161 Ind. 610, 69 N.E. 449;Stoddard v. Hibbler, 156 Mich. 335, 120 N.W. 787, 24 L.R.A., N.S., 1075; Empire S......