Mayson v. Malone, 45664
| Decision Date | 13 November 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 45664,No. 1,45664,1 |
| Citation | 122 Ga.App. 814,178 S.E.2d 806 |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Parties | James L. MAYSON, Transferee v. Estice MALONE et al |
James L. Mayson, Atlanta, for appellant.
Jones, Bird & Howell, Ruth H. Gershon, Atlanta, for appellees.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Appellees (defendants below) filed what they denominate 'a motion to set aside default judgment' which sought to attack a judgment rendered against them on January 8, 1963. The motion was predicated on the ground that neither defendant was personally served and that the return of service showed it to be insufficient and improper. On the hearing of this motion, the order of the trial judge recited 'upon hearing evidence and upon argument of counsel,' there was no valid process and the default judgment was void. Accordingly, the judgment of January 8, 1963, was vacated and set aside in its entirety. The appellant (plaintiff below) brings this appeal and contends that the motion was barred by the statute of limitation. Held:
1. 'A judgment void because of lack of jurisdiction of the person or subject-matter may be attacked at any time.' Code Ann. § 81A-160(f) (Ga.L.1966, pp. 609, 662; 1967, pp. 226, 239, 240). Where there is lack of personal service the three-year limitation contained in Code Ann. § 81A-160 is not applicable. This is in accordance with the law prior to the Civil Practice Act. See Strickland v. Willingham, 49 Ga.App. 355, 357, 175 S.E. 605; Buchan v. Williamson, 131 Ga. 501(3), 62 S.E. 815.
2. The appellees make a motion to dismiss the instant appeal on the grounds that it is not a final judgment and is premature. There was no certificate by the trial judge as provided in Code Ann. § 6-701(a)(2) (Ga.L.1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073). Of course, the denial of a motion to set aside and vacate a judgment is final and appealable. Farr v. Farr, 120 Ga.App. 762, 172 S.E.2d 158. However, the grant of a motion to set aside a judgment, like the grant of a motion for new trial, leaves the case still pending in the court below and thus is not a final judgment. Finch v. Kilgore, 120 Ga.App. 320, 170 S.E.2d 304. See also in this connection Watson v. Parke, Davis & Co., 117 Ga.App. 162, 159 S.E.2d 446, decided prior to the 1968 amendment to the Appellate Practice Act. The appeal is premature and must be dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dutton v. Dykes
...Ga.App. 762(2), 172 S.E.2d 158 (1969). 2. Although the denial of a motion to set aside is final and appealable (Mayson v. Malone, 122 Ga.App. 814(2), 178 S.E.2d 806 (1970)), such a motion is not one which will automatically extend the time for filing notice of appeal on the underlying judgm......
-
Guy v. Roberson
...of a motion for new trial, leaves the case [still] pending in the trial court below and is not a final judgment. Mayson v. Malone, 122 Ga.App. 814, 815, 178 S.E.2d 806. Because the judgment is not final, a direct appeal under OCGA § 5-6-34(a) is not authorized and appellant [has] failed to ......
-
Laff Lines, Ltd. v. Dimauro
...the grant of a motion for new trial, leaves the case pending in the trial court below and is not a final judgment. Mayson v. Malone, 122 Ga.App. 814, 815, 178 S.E.2d 806. Because the judgment is not final, a direct appeal under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) is not authorized and appellant failed to fol......
-
Stone v. Dawkins
...rather than "discretionary" motions to set aside. See Farr v. Farr, 120 Ga.App. 762, 172 S.E.2d 158 (1969); Mayson v. Malone, 122 Ga.App. 814(2), 178 S.E.2d 806 (1970). A "discretionary" motion to set aside is simply a request for the trial court to reconsider its decision, and we reiterate......