McAfee v. McAfee, A-3819
Decision Date | 04 February 1953 |
Docket Number | No. A-3819,A-3819 |
Citation | 255 S.W.2d 185,152 Tex. 156 |
Parties | McAFEE v. McAFEE. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
J. Manuel Hoppenstein, Dallas, for petitioner.
Burt Barr, Dallas, for respondent.
On July 28th, 1949, a judgment was rendered and entered in a cause numbered and styled 33947-Millicent Ann McAfee v. John M. McAfee, District Court, Dallas County, Texas, dissolving the bonds of matrimony between petitioner and respondent, and awarding the care and custody of their minor child, Dionne Hope McAfee, to petitioner. The judgment further ordered, adjudged and decreed that respondent pay to petitioner the sum of $160 per month for the support of said child, 'or until further ordered by the court and subject to the further orders of this court.'
On August 24, 1951, respondent filed a motion in the same case alleging that conditions had materially changed, in that, his income had been substantially reduced, and that the sum of $40 per week was more than sufficient to support the minor child. The petitioner filed her answer, and on the 5th day of December, 1951, the court, without the aid of a jury, after hearing the pleadings, evidence and argument of counsel, entered its judgment reducing the sum for the support of the child to $100 per month.
Petitioner perfected her appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District of Texas. That court sustained the motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal, holding that the judgment entered on December 5, 1951, was interlocutory 'and necessarily so, under Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 4639a, * * * is not appealable.' 250 S.W.2d 310, 311. This Court had granted a writ of error.
Article 4639a reads as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Huff v. Huff
...Schwartz v. Jefferson, 520 S.W.2d 881, 887 (Tex.1975); see also Curtis v. Gibbs, 511 S.W.2d 263, 266 (Tex.1974); McAfee v. McAfee, 152 Tex. 156, 255 S.W.2d 185, 186 (1953). The only traditional distinction between final divorce decrees and other final judgments has been the remedies availab......
-
Red v. Red
...(1955). See also Schwartz v. Jefferson, 520 S.W.2d 881 (Tex.1975); Curtis v. Gibbs, 511 S.W.2d 263 (Tex.1974), and McAfee v. McAfee, 152 Tex. 156, 255 S.W.2d 185 (1953). As to child support, that judgment was fully performed and discharged on July 9, 1966, when Diana reached the age of 18 y......
-
Chambers v. Girls Haven of Orange
...as we think the present one was. The situation may be illustrated by Ex parte Roberts, 139 Tex. 644, 165 S.W.2d and McAfee v. McAfee, Tex.Sup., 255 S.W.2d 185. Kelly v. Page, Tex.Civ.App., 186 S.W.2d 735, is not in point on the facts. The custodian was not a party and the institution sued f......
-
Hollis v. Hollis
...circumstances and justice may require, upon notice to such parent as above provided for, or with his or her consent.' McAfee v. McAfee, 152 Tex. 156, 255 S.W.2d 185 (1953). However, the rule was derived from the statutory enactment making specific provisions for minor children affected by d......