McAllister v. State
Decision Date | 12 May 1909 |
Parties | McALLISTER et al. v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Montague County; Clem B. Potter, Judge.
Charley McAllister and another were convicted of theft, and they appeal. Affirmed.
George S. March, for appellants. F. J. McCord, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The appellants were tried together, without objection, in the district court of Montague county, and were on February 3, 1909, found guilty of theft of property over the value of $50, and their punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years. They were charged with stealing two bales of cotton, the property of one J. K. Bruce, from his possession and that of McNabb, Winder & Hunt, a partnership composed of the three persons named, whose initials were given in the indictment.
1. The theft was clearly shown by the state's testimony, and the taking is in express terms admitted by both appellants. They sought, as we understand, by their testimony to show that the property was taken at different times, or under circumstances that would constitute the taking of the two bales of cotton separate offenses. On this subject McAllister testifies as follows: Bud Walser, the other appellant, testified as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Vineyard v. State
...or of such manifest harmful character as to demand a reversal. Howard v. State, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 378, 111 S. W. 1038; McAllister v. State, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 188, 120 S. W. 420. We think the only safe rule to be that this court should not hold an argument to be reversible error unless it is in ex......