McCaffrey Brothers Co. v. Hart-Williams Coal Co.
Decision Date | 26 September 1914 |
Docket Number | 17,822 |
Citation | 148 N.W. 966,96 Neb. 774 |
Parties | MCCAFFREY BROTHERS COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. HART-WILLIAMS COAL COMPANY, APPELLANT |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the district court for Douglas county: LEE S. ESTELLE JUDGE. Affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Smyth Smith & Schall, for appellant.
Mahoney & Kennedy, contra.
The plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Douglas county to recover on an alleged contract of sale of a quantity of Portland cement by defendant to plaintiff. It is alleged that defendant failed and refused to fulfil its contract, though duly requested so to do. The defendant filed a general demurrer to the amended petition, which was overruled, and judgment entered for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed.
The contention is that the allegations of the petition are insufficient, and that it is not alleged that the defendant made any contract whereby it agreed to sell plaintiff the cement specified. The petition alleges: Exhibit A is as follows:
A contract for the sale of personal property for the price of $ 50 or more, when no payment is made on the purchase and no part of the goods accepted, cannot be enforced unless "a note or memorandum of such contract be made in writing and be subscribed by the party to be charged thereby." Rev. St 1913, sec. 2631. The petition alleges that E. G. Hickey, who signed the memorandum of contract, was duly authorized by defendant to make such contract, and that McCaffrey was duly authorized by p...
To continue reading
Request your trial