McCallum v. State, 88-2467

Decision Date15 February 1990
Docket NumberNo. 88-2467,88-2467
Parties15 Fla. L. Weekly D1020, 15 Fla. L. Weekly D464 Christopher McCALLUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and James R. Wulchak, Chief, Appellate Division, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

LEE, R.E., Jr., Associate Judge.

Appellant, Christopher McCallum, appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree attempted murder with a firearm. Appellant and a codefendant, Leonard Brooks, were convicted of the attempted murder of Juan Ward. Ward was first shot on June 9, 1988, at Gwen's Inn in Ocala, and taken to Monroe Regional Hospital. On the next night, around midnight, two black males entered Ward's room at the hospital and shot him twice before fleeing. This appeal is from appellant's conviction for the hospital shooting. We reverse.

Ward testified that he was lying in his darkened hospital room, resting with his eyes closed, when the first shot was fired. Being aroused by the report, he opened his eyes and saw his assailants, whom he later identified as appellant and Brooks.

Another hospital employee, Toni Howell, heard the gunshots and ran into the hall just in time to see two black men race by, turning briefly to face her. After the police arrived, Howell identified one of the men from a series of photographs, but unfortunately, the record fails to state which of the men she identified. Later, at trial, she identified both appellant and Brooks as the two men she had seen in the hall.

Nanette Bradford, Ward's nurse, rushed into the room after hearing the shots. After Ward was stabilized, she asked him if he could identify the assailants. Ward nodded affirmatively and wrote "same." Bradford asked him if he meant the same people who had shot him the night before, and Ward nodded "yes." He then wrote "poli" and Bradford asked him if he meant that the police knew the identity of the previous assailants. Again Ward nodded "yes."

The owner of Gwen's Inn, Gwen King, testified that she saw appellant at her bar just after the first shooting on June 9th. Keith Escarvage, an Ocala police officer, arrived at Gwen's Inn shortly after the shooting and talked with the victim, Ward. When the officer asked Ward if he knew the assailant, Ward responded that Eric Dobson had shot him. David Parkins, another police officer, also spoke with Ward on the night of the Gwen's Inn shooting. When asked who had shot him, Ward answered that he had been shot by a man named "Dougie," later identified as Eric Dobson.

Appellant took the stand in his own defense and denied having shot Ward on either night. This story was verified by his girl friend, Charlotte McFatten, who stated that she was not with him on the night of the Gwen's Inn shooting, but that throughout the night of the hospital shooting appellant remained with her at her mother's house. McFatten's mother, Altamese Grant, testified that the couple had spent the night on her couch, from well before midnight (the time of the hospital shooting) until the next morning, when she woke the couple, telling them the TV news reported Juan Ward had been shot again the night before.

Having heard this and other testimony, the jury returned with a verdict finding appellant guilty of attempted first degree murder with a firearm. Appellant then filed a motion for a new trial, citing newly discovered evidence and providing the court with two affidavits in support of the motion; one from Charlotte McFatten, now married to appellant, and another from Edwin Washington. McFatten's affidavit includes an admission made to her by Eric Dobson around the time of the shooting in which Dobson informed her that he shot Ward at Gwen's Inn. Because of McFatten's relationship to appellant, her affidavit alone is insufficient to require a new trial.

Of more importance is Ed Washington's affidavit. Washington stated, among other things, that appellant was with him when Eric Dobson said he was going to teach Ward to respect him and fired a machine gun into the ground as Ward drove by. Washington's affidavit further asserts that he personally witnessed the attack on Ward at Gwen's Inn and appellant was not a participant. Even more relevant is Washington's statement that he ran into Leonard Brooks (appellant's codefendant) and James "Bo" Crosby after the unsuccessful attempt to murder Ward at Gwen's Inn, and listened to them brag that they were going to go to the hospital to "finish off the job." Moreover, Washington alleged appellant and Crosby strongly resemble each other and have been mistaken for brothers. Washington stated he did not come forward with this testimony earlier because he was afraid of Eric Dobson, Crosby, and a man known as "Snake." Appellant's trial counsel claims she did not learn of Washington's testimony until the day of appellant's conviction, when two public defenders advised her of Washington's information.

A new trial will not be granted for newly-discovered evidence unless:

1. Such evidence is discovered after the former trial;

2. It was not previously discoverable in the exercise of reasonable diligence;

3. It is material to the issue in question;

4. It goes to the merits of the case;

5. It is not cumulative;

6. As such, it would produce a different verdict.

McVeigh v. State, 73 So.2d 694 (Fla.1954), appeal dismissed, 348 U.S. 885, 75 S.Ct. 210, 99 L.Ed. 696 (1954); Taylor v. State, 522 So.2d 418 (...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Brown v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • August 23, 1991
    ...court to deny a new trial where the court is not satisfied that changed testimony after recantation is true. See however McCallum v. State, 559 So.2d 233 (Fla.App.1990), where the affidavit provided a strong inference of appellant's innocence. There should be resort to a jury to hear the wi......
  • Malcolm v. State, 90-1806
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 29, 1992
    ...and this compelling factor requires us to relax the due diligence requirement for coram nobis relief. See also McCallum v. State, 559 So.2d 233, 235 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Beyond that, it is clear that the clerk misperformed a ministerial duty when he/she recorded the defendant's 1983 judgmen......
  • Hubbard v. State, 1D04-5004.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • October 18, 2005
    ...692 So.2d 174, 177 (Fla.1997) (citing, among other cases, Jent v. State, 408 So.2d 1024, 1031 (Fla.1981)); McCallum v. State, 559 So.2d 233, 235 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). As our supreme court explained in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202-03 (Fla.1980), this standard of review require......
  • Cammarano v. State, 92-759
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 31, 1992
    ...with him would not have brought forth his recantation, however diligently his interviewer questioned him. Cf. McCallum v. State, 559 So.2d 233 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Further, we do not think Potenzo's possible fabrication of testimony at trial should be foreclosed at this point from considera......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT