McCarty v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 05 December 1890 |
Citation | 15 S.W. 164 |
Parties | McCARTY <I>et al.</I> v. GULF, C. & S. F. RY. CO. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Appeal from district court, Ellis county; ANSON RAINEY, Judge.
D. F. Singleton, G. C. Grace, and M. B. Templeton, for appellants. Alexander Clark and T. W. Terry, for appellee.
Appellants sue to recover for injury to cattle resulting from two causes, for both of which it is claimed appellee is liable. (1) It is claimed that appellee contracted to furnish cars and to receive appellants' beeves on September 24, 1887, for transportation from Ballinger, Tex., to Chicago, Ill., but that appellee failed to do this until four days afterwards, whereby they were damaged on account of deterioration of cattle while held at or near place of shipment, where the pasturage was not good; and further, that on account of this delay appellants were compelled to incur expenses that would not have been necessary had the cars been furnished and the beeves shipped as per contract set up by appellants. (2) It is claimed that the beeves were roughly handled after they were received, and that there was unreasonable delay in transportation, which caused increased expense, deterioration of the cattle, and loss in other ways. It was claimed that the contract to furnish cars and receive the beeves on the 24th September was made by the railway company's station agent at Ballinger, and his authority to make such a contract, as well as the fact whether he assumed to do so, was controverted. Appellee alleged that the beeves were shipped under a written contract which contained the following stipulations: "It is further agreed between the parties hereto that in case the live-stock mentioned herein is to be transported over the line or lines of any other railroad or steam-boat company, the said party of the first part shall be released from liability of any kind, after said livestock shall have left its road, and the party of the second part hereby so expressly stipulates and agrees, the understanding of both parties hereto being that the party of the first part shall not be held or deemed liable for anything beyond the line of the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway, excepting to protect the through rate of freight named herein." The contract was proved as alleged, and it was shown that the beeves were transported on appellee's road, after they were received, from Ballinger to McGregor, without injury or unnecessary delay, and that at the latter place the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cook v. Northern Pacific Railway Company
... ... has induced, the owner to delay the bringing of suit beyond ... the time stipulated. 6 Cyc. 509, and cases cited; Gulf, ... C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Stanley, 89 Tex. 42, 33 S.W. 112 ... Watson & Young and E. T. Conmy, for respondent ... 97; North British & M. Ins. Co. v. Central Vermont ... R. Co. 9 A.D. 4, 40 N.Y.S. 1113, affirmed in 158 N.Y ... 726, 53 N.E. 1128; McCarty v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R ... Co. 79 Tex. 33, 15 S.W. 164; Thompson v. Chicago & A. R. Co. 22 Mo.App. 321; 6 Cyc. 508 and cases cited; ... ...
-
The Eldridge
... ... reasonable, is no longer an open question. The Henry S. Grove ... (D.C.) 283 F. 1019. See, also, Gulf, C. & S.F.R. Co. v ... Gatewood, 79 Tex. 89, 14 S.W. 913, 10 L.R.A. 419; ... McCarty v. Gulf, C. & S.F. Ry. Co., 79 Tex. 33, 15 ... S.W. 164; ... ...
-
Beck v. General Ins. Co. of America
... ... special contracts, short limitations in bills of lading were ... held to be valid and enforceable. McCarty v. Gulf, etc., ... Ry., 79 Tex. 33, 15 S.W. 164; Thompson v. Chicago, ... etc., Ry., 22 Mo.App. 321. See [141 Or. 459] cases to ... ...
-
Sims v. The Missouri Pacific Railway Company
... ... Missouri statutes forbidding such special contracts, short ... limitations in bills of lading were held to be valid and ... enforceable. [McCarty & Gulf, etc., Ry., 79 Tex. 33, 15 S.W ... 164; Thompson v. Chicago, etc., Ry., 22 Mo.App. 321 ... See cases to same effect cited in 6 Cyc. 508.] ... ...