McCauley v. McCauley, 91-00582

Decision Date17 April 1992
Docket NumberNo. 91-00582,91-00582
Citation599 So.2d 1002
PartiesKim C. McCAULEY, Appellant, v. Steven J. McCAULEY, Appellee. 599 So.2d 1002, 17 Fla. L. Week. D996
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

HALL, Judge.

We have decided to hear this case en banc in order to resolve an intradistrict conflict between Thomasson v. Thomasson, 562 So.2d 428 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), and Stultz v. Stultz, 504 So.2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), on the issue of child support for a child beyond the age of majority who has not yet completed high school. We approve Stultz and recede from Thomasson to the extent it conflicts with this opinion.

Kim McCauley has raised three issues with regard to the final judgment of dissolution of her marriage to Steven McCauley. We only find merit in one of those issues and therefore affirm in part and reverse in part.

The parties were married in 1978 and separated in 1990. Lucas, Kim's natural child, was born in 1973 and was adopted by Steven. At the time of the filing of the petition for dissolution, Steven was employed as a heavy equipment operator, earning $3200 per month. Kim was unemployed and had been so for the entire term of the marriage except for a three-month period when she worked at Eckerd's. The parties' assets consisted of a home encumbered by a mortgage, a time share unit, and two motor vehicles. They had a number of credit card balances and little to no cash. At the time of the final hearing, Kim was attending St. Petersburg Junior College, pursuing a four-year course of study to become a medical laboratory technician.

In its final judgment of dissolution, the trial court awarded the marital home to Kim and the time share unit to Steven; divided the vehicles and the credit card debts; denied Kim's request for permanent periodic alimony; awarded Kim $170 per month as rehabilitative alimony for three years; and ordered Steven to pay child support of $145 per week until Lucas reaches majority (January 18, 1991).

Kim first contends, citing Thomasson, that the trial court erred in denying her request for child support for Lucas until he finishes high school, notwithstanding the fact he has reached the age of majority. In Thomasson, this court stated that a finding by the trial court that a child in the same circumstances was entitled to support would be consistent with the law. That law was cited to be Evans v. Evans, 456 So.2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), in which case the First District concluded that legal dependency encompasses economic dependency and affirmed the trial court's order requiring Mr. Evans to continue to provide support for his son, who had reached the age of majority, until he finished high school.

We disagree with Evans and consequently recede from Thomasson. We believe our opinion in Stultz, one of the cases relied on by Steven, contains the correct statement of the law on this issue because it recognizes that "if a legal duty to provide post-majority high school education support is to be created, the legislature is the fountain out of which that legal duty is to spring." Stultz, 504 So.2d at 6. In Stultz we stated that "there is no legal duty to pay child support beyond the age of eighteen--the age of majority in Florida--absent a finding of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Ribner v. Ribner
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • May 2, 1996
    ...that a child "labors under any mental or physical incapacities[,]" a request for child support will be denied. McCauley v. McCauley, 599 So.2d 1002, 1004 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1992); Stultz v. Stultz, 504 So.2d 5, 6 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1986); see also Madson v. Madson, 636 So.2d 759, 760-61 It was ......
  • Oxley v. Oxley
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 19, 1997
    ...that the husband has the ability to pay, as his available income exceeds $45,000 per month. We have considered McCauley v. McCauley, 599 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), Martinez-Cid v. Martinez-Cid, 559 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), and McLauchlin v. McLauchlin, 580 So.2d 812 (Fla. 2d DCA),......
  • Rogers v. Rogers, 92-03189
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 23, 1993
    ...that the trial court erred in failing to award her rehabilitative alimony during the period of her schooling. See McCauley v. McCauley, 599 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Even though Mrs. Rogers is attending travel agent school, because of her age and lack of previous work experience, her c......
  • Hunt v. Hunt, 93-03718
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 1994
    ...circumstances, we cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding rehabilitative alimony. See McCauley v. McCauley, 599 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We do, however, determine that the award is inadequate in duration and that the reduction to $500 in the second year is er......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT