McCissell v. Com.
Decision Date | 04 October 1957 |
Parties | Ruby McCISSELL, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky |
Vert C. Fraser, Providence, for appellant.
Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Appellant, Ruby McCissell, was convicted in the Webster Circuit Court of the offense of possessing alcoholic beverages for the purpose of sale in local option territory. The punishment imposed was a fine of $100 and 30 days in jail.
The principal question concerns the sufficiency of the affidavit and search warrant which did not describe particularly an automobile found on the premises described in the affidavit.
We have this day held in the case of Massey v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 755, that it is not necessary to describe the automobile found on the premises searched under a warrant otherwise valid and that opinion is controlling here.
The record discloses that the verdict was based upon sufficient evidence.
The motion for appeal is therefore overruled and the judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Korreckt v. State
...all property necessarily part of the premises or so inseparable as to constitute a portion thereof." Id. See also McCissell v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 756 (Ky.1957) (decided on authority of Massey ); State v. Reid, 286 N.C. 323, 210 S.E.2d 422 (1974) (decided on authority of Massey ); Stat......
- Peacock v. State
-
People v. Jones
...1974); Bellamy v. State, 134 Ga.App. 340, 214 S.E.2d 383 (1975); State v. Sykes, 412 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa, 1987); McCissell v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 756 (Ky., 1957); Massey v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 755 (Ky., 1957); State v. Lewis, 270 N.W.2d 891 (Minn., 1978); State v. Reid, 286 N.C. 323,......
-
State v. Reid
...the premises, a vehicle found thereon may be searched even though the warrant contains no description of the vehicle. McCissell v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 756 (Ky.1957). In Lawson v. State, 176 Tenn. 457, 143 S.W.2d 716 (1940), where the vehicle was owned by the person mentioned in the war......