McCissell v. Com.

Decision Date04 October 1957
PartiesRuby McCISSELL, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

Vert C. Fraser, Providence, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ruby McCissell, was convicted in the Webster Circuit Court of the offense of possessing alcoholic beverages for the purpose of sale in local option territory. The punishment imposed was a fine of $100 and 30 days in jail.

The principal question concerns the sufficiency of the affidavit and search warrant which did not describe particularly an automobile found on the premises described in the affidavit.

We have this day held in the case of Massey v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 755, that it is not necessary to describe the automobile found on the premises searched under a warrant otherwise valid and that opinion is controlling here.

The record discloses that the verdict was based upon sufficient evidence.

The motion for appeal is therefore overruled and the judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Korreckt v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 9 Diciembre 1986
    ...all property necessarily part of the premises or so inseparable as to constitute a portion thereof." Id. See also McCissell v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 756 (Ky.1957) (decided on authority of Massey ); State v. Reid, 286 N.C. 323, 210 S.E.2d 422 (1974) (decided on authority of Massey ); Stat......
  • Peacock v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 7 Septiembre 2022
  • People v. Jones
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 19 Marzo 2002
    ...1974); Bellamy v. State, 134 Ga.App. 340, 214 S.E.2d 383 (1975); State v. Sykes, 412 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa, 1987); McCissell v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 756 (Ky., 1957); Massey v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 755 (Ky., 1957); State v. Lewis, 270 N.W.2d 891 (Minn., 1978); State v. Reid, 286 N.C. 323,......
  • State v. Reid
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 2 Octubre 1974
    ...the premises, a vehicle found thereon may be searched even though the warrant contains no description of the vehicle. McCissell v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 756 (Ky.1957). In Lawson v. State, 176 Tenn. 457, 143 S.W.2d 716 (1940), where the vehicle was owned by the person mentioned in the war......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT