McClain v. Starr

Decision Date13 July 1915
Docket Number4997.
Citation150 P. 666,50 Okla. 738
PartiesMCCLAIN ET AL. v. STARR ET AL.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

Under the statutes of this state, an appeal will lie from the district, superior, or county courts to the Supreme Court without entering into a supersedeas bond. The only purpose and effect of such bond is to stay execution, or other proceedings to enforce the judgment.

After the time has expired for appeal, and the judgment has become final, and not paid, or otherwise stayed, an action will lie on a statutory supersedeas bond, conditioned for the payment of "the condemnation money and costs, in case the judgment or final order shall be affirmed in whole, or in part," even though the appeal has not been perfected, or fails for want of prosecution.

In an action on an appeal or supersedeas bond, it is necessary to allege that the judgment in which said bond is given has not been paid, and that the time for taking appeal has expired and, in case said petition does not allege such facts, it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and a demurrer thereto on that ground should be sustained.

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 4. Error from County Court, Rogers County; H. Tom Kight, Judge.

Action by A. N. Starr and others against Hattie J. McClain and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error. Reversed and remanded.

H Jennings, of Claremore, for plaintiffs in error.

W. H Bassmann, of Claremore, for defendants in error.

ROBBERTS C.

On the 29th day of December, 1909, the defendants in error recovered judgment for $90 against W. T. Taylor, before a justice of the peace in Rogers county. The defendant appealed to the county court, and in so doing entered into an appeal bond with A. N. Starr, one of the plaintiffs in error herein, as sole surety. The case was tried in the county court, and judgment rendered for plaintiffs. Thereupon, evidently with the intention to appeal said case to the Supreme Court, the defendant executed a supersedeas bond, with plaintiffs in error B. H. Hester and E. M. Eaton as sureties. For some reason the case was not appealed to this court, and evidently the judgment in the county court became final. Thereafter the judgment creditors, who are defendants in error herein, commenced an action in the county court against A. N. Starr, surety on the appeal bond, and B. H. Hester and E. M. Eaton, sureties, on the supersedeas bond, said action being based on both of said undertakings. The petition in said case is as follows:

"Come now the above-named plaintiffs, and for cause of action against the defendants allege and state:
First. That on the 29th day of December, 1909, these plaintiffs obtained a judgment against one W. T. Taylor in a suit entitled Hattie J. McClain and Sarah V. McClain, by Their Next Friend and Natural Guardian, Mrs. W. B Kittermann, v. W. T. Taylor, Defendant, in civil case No. 279, before E. J. Humphrey, justice of the peace, in the sum of $90, together with an attorney fee of $10, as is evidenced by a certified copy of the transcript in such case hereto attached, marked 'Exhibit A,' and made a part hereof.
Second. That on the 1st day of January, 1910, the defendant A. N. Starr made and executed an appeal bond in the above-cited action, which said appeal bond was for the purpose of carrying the said cause on appeal to the county court of Rogers county, a copy of which said bond is hereto attached, marked 'Exhibit B,' and made a part hereof.
Third. That upon the filing of said bond, said case was appealed to the county court of Rogers county, state of Oklahoma, and is known on the dockets of said court as case No. 241 Civil.
Fourth. That on the 30th day of January, 1911, said case was tried in said county court of Rogers county, state of Oklahoma, before Hon. H. Tom Kight, judge of said court, being the trial upon the appeal of said cause, and that upon that date the parties to said suit having waived a jury, judgment was rendered by the court in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $96.75 and costs, as is shown by the records of said court.
Fifth. That on the 31st day of January, 1911, the defendant William T. Taylor filed a supersedeas bond in the sum of $96.75, which said bond was signed by B. H. Hester and E. M. Eaton as sureties, as is evidenced by a copy of said bond, which is hereto attached, marked 'Exhibit C,' and made a part hereof.
Sixth. That this bond was given for the purpose therein stated, which was for the purpose of carrying an appeal of said case to the Supreme Court of the state of Oklahoma.
Seventh. That the defendant in that action William T. Taylor failed and refused and neglected to carry said case to the Supreme Court of the state of Oklahoma, and it was never appealed under such bond.
Eighth. That the plaintiffs have made demand upon the defendants A. N. Starr, B. H. Hester, and E. M. Eaton for the payment of said judgment under said bond, but said defendants have refused and neglected, and still refuse and neglect to make payment under said bond.
Wherefore, premises considered, plaintiffs pray that they may have judgment against the defendants in the sum of $96.75, with an attorney fee of $10 and all costs in the case herein laid out and expended, and for such other and further relief as to the court may seem fit and proper."

"Exhibit B.

We, W. T. Taylor, as principal, and Arch N. Starr, as sureties and residents of said Rogers county, hereby undertake and bind ourselves to the said Hattie J. McClain and Sarah V. McClain, Mrs. W. B. Kittermann, next friend in the above-entitled action, in the sum of two hundred fifteen and 30/100 dollars ($215.30), that being double the amount of the judgment and costs rendered against said appellant, W. T. Taylor, in said action, that said appellant will prosecute his appeal from said judgment to the county court of said Rogers county to effect and without necessary delay, and if judgment be rendered against him on the appeal, that he will satisfy such judgment and costs.
Witness our hands this 1st day of January, 1910.
W. T. Taylor.
A. N. Starr."

"Exhibit C.

Know all men by these presents: William T. Taylor, principal obligor, and B. H. Hester and E. M. Eaton, sureties, are held and firmly bound unto Hattie J. McClain and Sarah V. McClain, by their next friend and natural guardian, Mrs. W. B. Kittermann, plaintiffs in the above-entitled cause, in the sum of three hundred dollars ($300.00), for the payment of which well and truly to be made, we, and each of us, do hereby jointly and severally bind ourselves, our successors and assigns.
Dated this 31st day of January, A. D. 1911.
The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas, on the 30th day of January, 1911, judgment was rendered in favor of said obligee, plaintiff in said cause, and against William T. Taylor, the principal obligor, defendant in said cause, for the sum of ninty-six and 75/100 ($96.75) and costs; and whereas, said defendant has taken
an appeal from said judgment to the
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Funk v. First Nat. Bank of Miami
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1939
    ...the property of intervener, pending determination of the appeal. O. S. 1931, sec. 543, 12 Okla. St. Ann. § 968. Starr et al. v. McClain et al. (1915) 50 Okla. 738, 150 P. 666; Scott v. Joines et al. (1918) 71 Okla. 89, 175 P. 504; Howe et al v. Farmers &Merchants Bank et al. (1932) 155 Okla......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT