McClellan v. State
Citation | 156 S.W.2d 800,203 Ark. 386 |
Decision Date | 15 December 1941 |
Docket Number | 4236 |
Parties | MCCLELLAN v. STATE |
Court | Supreme Court of Arkansas |
Appeal from Baxter Circuit Court; John L. Bledsoe, Judge; affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Jack Holt, Attorney General, and Jno. P. Streepey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
The appellant was tried and convicted of grand larceny, and his punishment was fixed by the jury at one year in the penitentiary. To reverse this judgment, this appeal is prosecuted. The appellant has filed no brief.
Herschel Russell testified in substance that he had lived at Iuka Izard county, for twelve or thirteen years; in 1938, he owned a few cattle; that one of the steers was taken the latter part of July or the first of August; witness lives about a quarter of a mile from the line between Izard and Baxter counties.
Virgil Killian testified in substance that he was acquainted with appellant; that in 1938, he owned some cattle; that one heifer was stolen; it was taken to West Plains by Albert Pickens and appellant; witness went with a man to appellant's house to investigate; as they approached the house appellant was on the porch, but before they got there appellant went through the house and was gone 30 or 40 minutes.
A. E Adamson testified in substance that he lived at West Plains, Missouri, and had been a post office inspector for several years; he was inspector during 1938 and 1939 and made some investigation relative to the use of the mails; he saw appellant in 1939 at the post office at Jordan. Witness here introduced the following statement by appellant and said there was no promise of reward or threats used:
Witness Adamson said that appellant read the statement before he signed it, and knew what was in it; appellant indicated to witness that he was going to tell the prosecuting attorney what was in it; he repeated that no promises or threats were made; witness learned that a check had been mailed by a commission company to Fred Snyder and appellant told him all about it; does not know whether appellant had talked to the prosecuting attorney or not; the events in the other case indicated appellant testified for the state and he was not prosecuted.
The prosecuting attorney, R. H. Wood, testified in substance that appellant made a statement to him in the presence of appellant's brother, Ben McClellan, in October, 1939, relative to property taken from Virgil Killian and Herschel Russell; appellant did not come to see witness, as he had promised he would, for two or three weeks, so witness went to see appellant; appellant told him all about the Killian and Russell matter.
There was then introduced the following statement, made by appellant:
Witness Wood said that no promises were made to appellant; appellant asked him to recommend a suspended sentence, but witness told him he would not do it; that he had dismissed two cases against appellant and that any punishment in this case would have to be left to the court appellant then asked witness if he would be barred...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Trotter v. Stephens
...citing Monts v. State, 233 Ark. 816, 349 S.W.2d 350 (1961), Burton v. State, 204 Ark. 548, 163 S.W.2d 160 (1943), McClellan v. State, 203 Ark. 386, 156 S.W.2d 800 (1941). It should be pointed out that Jackson v. Denno, supra, was decided almost three months after the Arkansas Supreme Court'......
-
Mitchell v. Stephens
...233 Ark. 816, 823, 349 S.W.2d 350, 355 (1961); Burton v. State, 204 Ark. 548, 550-551, 163 S.W.2d 160, 162 (1942); and McClellan v. State, 203 Ark. 386, 393-394, 156 S. W.2d 800, 803 (1941). These cases do indicate that Arkansas followed the New York practice. The State concedes this when i......
-
Jackson v. Denno, 62
...816, 823, 349 S.W.2d 350, 355 (1961); Burton v. State, 204 Ark. 548, 550-551, 163 S.W.2d 160, 162 (1942); McClellan v. State, 203 Ark. 386, 393-394, 156 S.W.2d 800, 803 (1941). DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: Wright v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 36, 45, 250 F.,2d 4, 13 (1957); Catoe v. United St......
-
Mitchell v. Stephens
...g., see Monts v. State, 233 Ark. 816, 349 S.W.2d 350 (1961). Burton v. State, 204 Ark. 548, 163 S.W. 2d 160 (1943); McClellan v. State, 203 Ark. 386, 156 S.W.2d 800 (1941). Even so, the instant case must be distinguished from these cases, as well as Jackson v. Denno, supra, in which Mr. Jus......