McClure v. Hightower, 31002

Decision Date29 June 1976
Docket NumberNo. 31002,31002
Citation227 S.E.2d 47,237 Ga. 157
PartiesJames R. McCLURE v. Robert E. HIGHTOWER, Director, et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Thomas J. Charron, Marietta, for appellant.

Awtrey, Parker, Risse, Mangerie & Brantley, P.C., Donald A. Mangerie, Toby B. Prodgers, Marietta, for appellees.

HILL, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the Cobb Superior Court dismissing James R. McClure's petition for mandamus. McClure, a police officer, sought to compel the director of public safety to restore him to the rank of sergeant in the Cobb County Police Department.

McClure had been a sergeant with the county police department until he was demoted by Director Hightower to the rank of patrolman in January 1975 based on two charges of misconduct. He appealed to the Cobb County Civil Service Board. In March the civil service board decided that a strongly written reprimand be issued, that his pay be reduced for six months, and that his performance record be reviewed in May 1975 for possible reinstatement to the rank of sergeant. In May the civil service board moved to reinstate McClure to the rank of sergeant but at the same time upheld one of the charges of misconduct.

After the director of public safety refused to restore McClure to the rank of sergeant, McClure brought an action for mandamus. One of the defenses urged by the defendants was that the civil service board failed to follow the board's rules and regulations adopted by the Cobb County Commissioners and exceeded its authority in reinstating the petitioner in that those rules and regulations authorize the civil service board only to affirm or disaffirm the actions of the appointing authority. At trial when the defendants offered those rules and regulations into evidence, plaintiff's objection was sustained.

The Cobb Superior Court dismissed the petition because the plaintiff failed to prove that the director of public safety had a legal duty to restore McClure to the rank of sergeant. McClure appeals to this court.

Although McClure sets out ten enumerations of error, the determinative issue is whether McClure met his burden of showing a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Code Ann. § 64-101 states that a writ of mandamus may issue to compel a due performance of an official duty. It must appear that the petitioner has a clear legal right to have the particular act performed. See Smith v. Branch, 215 Ga. 744, 113 S.E.2d 445 (1960); Troutman v. Aiken, 213 Ga. 55, 96 S.E.2d 585 (1957).

McClure contends that the director of public safety had a legal duty to reinstate him after the May decision of the Civil Service Board. Georgia Laws 1964, p. 2502 et seq. provides for the establishment of a civil service board in Cobb County. Among the listed duties of the civil...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Crowder v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1976
    ... ... Schneble v. Florida, supra; see State v. Hightower, 236 Ga. 58, 222 S.E.2d 333 (1976) ...         There is a difference between a ... ...
  • DeKalb County v. Winkler, 56455
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 28, 1978
    ...taken by the superior court or this court of city or county ordinances, but they must be alleged and proved." Accord, McClure v. Hightower, 237 Ga. 157, 158, 227 S.E.2d 47. Therefore, in passing upon the issues of this case it was error to consider the DeKalb County 2. The DeKalb County Mer......
  • City of Atlanta v. Whitten, 54831
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 1, 1977
    ...because the rules and regulations which appellee was charged with violating do not appear in the record. See generally McClure v. Hightower, 237 Ga. 157, 227 S.E.2d 47; Dept. of Human Resources v. Sims, 137 Ga.App. 72(4), 222 S.E.2d Since the language of the rules and regulations were conta......
  • Dix v. State, 60669
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 5, 1981
    ...140 Ga.App. 747, 750, 231 S.E.2d 826 (1976); Beall v. Dept. of Revenue, 148 Ga.App. 5, 7(2), 251 S.E.2d 4 (1978); McClure v. Hightower, 237 Ga. 157, 158, 227 S.E.2d 47 (1976). Without reference to the regulations governing appellant's entitlement to AFDC, food stamps and medicaid, it is imp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT