McCoy v. Clark
Decision Date | 21 October 1899 |
Citation | 109 Iowa 464,80 N.W. 538 |
Parties | MCCOY v. CLARK. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from district court, Appanoose county; F. W. Eichelberger, Judge.
Action to enjoin the defendant from keeping and maintaining a nuisance in a building described by therein keeping for sale and selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law, and to abate the nuisance. The court found the existence of the nuisance to be established, and plaintiff's attorneys presented for approval a form of decree ordering the destruction of the liquors, the removal and sale of the fixtures, furniture, vessels, and movable property used in conducting the unlawful business, and that the sheriff of the county “effectually close the said building against its use for any purpose prohibited by title 12, c. 6, of the Code of Iowa, as the same is now in force, and so keep it closed for one year, unless sooner released.” The defendant, McCoy, objected to that part of the decree quoted above, and thereupon the court inserted in the decree the words, “but not as against any other use or purpose,” and, as thus changed, approved the same, and to this the plaintiff excepted, and from it he appeals. Reversed.Baker & Moore, for appellant.
Mabry & Payne, for appellee.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lewis v. Brennan
...the building to be closed, entered in pursuance of a mandatory statute. McClure v. Braniff, 75 Iowa 38, 39 N.W. 171; McCoy v. Clark, 109 Iowa 464, 80 N.W. 538. motion then was rightly overruled. The court was not called upon for an interpretation of the decree, and, if an erroneous reason f......
-
Lewis v. Brennan
...the building to be closed, entered in pursuance of a mandatory statute. McClure v. Braniff, 75 Iowa, 38, 39 N. W. 171;McCoy v. Clark, 109 Iowa, 464, 80 N. W. 538. The motion then was rightly overruled. The court was not called upon for an interpretation of the decree, and, if an erroneous r......
- McCoy v. Clark