Mccravy v. Schneer's, 23227.
Decision Date | 07 October 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 23227.,23227. |
Citation | 171 S.E. 391,47 Ga.App. 703 |
Parties | McCRAVY. v. SCHNEER'S. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. Civil Code 1910, § 442S. Measured by this standard, the petition fails to set forth a cause of action.
2. Unless the alleged libelous matter is communicated by the defendant to a person other than the plaintiff, there is no publication thereof.
Error from Superior Court, Fulton County; John D. Humphries, Judge.
Suit by F. O. McCravy, Jr., against Schneer's. To review a judgment sustaining a general demurrer to the petition, plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed.
Louis H. Foster and John H. Payne, both of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
Ellis McClelland, of Atlanta, for defendant in error.
The plaintiff brought an action for libel, alleging that the defendant sent to him by registered mail the following letter, which is alleged to be libelous per se. The petition states that the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant for merchandise to which the defendant had retained title. The court sustained a general demurrer and dismissed the petition.
To maintain an action for libel, the matter published must either be libelous per se, or it must be so stated that it may reasonably be construed, by innuendo at least, to be libelous. It must also be communicated to some person other than the plaintiff. The petition itself shows that this was a letter written by the defendant to the plaintiff, sent by registered mail. Without more, this does not amount to a publication. The allegation in the petition that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ray v. Henco Electronics, Inc.
...in sustaining the motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant corporation and its defendant president. See McCravy v. Schneer's, 47 Ga.App. 703, 171 S.E. 391. 3. As to the remaining defendant (now a former employer) who wrote the note to the check writer and which note contained t......