McCue v. Wapello County
Decision Date | 21 October 1881 |
Citation | 10 N.W. 248,56 Iowa 698 |
Parties | MCCUE v. THE COUNTY OF WAPELLO |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Wapello District Court.
ACTION at law to recover for services rendered by plaintiff as sheriff of the defendant county. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and judgment rendered for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The facts of the case appear in the opinion.
REVERSED.
Moore & Hammond, for appellant.
William McNett and H. B. Hendershot, for appellee.
I. The petition alleges that plaintiff between the 19th day of September, 1878, and the 7th day of April, 1879, was acting sheriff of Wapello county, and, in the discharge of his duty as such officer, he rendered certain services and expended certain sums of money, for which, together with an amount due him as salary, he seeks to recover in this action. The answer denies the allegations of the petition and avers the facts connected with plaintiff's claim to be substantially as set out in the finding of the court, which will hereafter appear. It further alleges that plaintiff performed the services and made the expenditures sued upon as deputy of the sheriff of the county, and that whatever claim he has therefor should be made against and adjusted with the sheriff for the services and outlay in question. Upon the issues thus presented the cause was tried to the court.
II. The plaintiff filed an amended abstract setting out the facts and conclusions of law found by the District Court, which defendant moved to strike for the reason that neither of the parties requested the court to make such findings. In support of this motion counsel for defendant insist that, to authorize the court to find specially the facts and conclusions of law, a request therefore must be made at least by one of the parties to the action. This position is based upon Code, section 2743. For the purposes of this case we may admit, without, however, so deciding, that this position is correct. But as the court has made the finding, in the absence of a contrary showing in the record, we will presume it was done in pursuance of the request of one of the parties. Acts of the court of this kind done in the progress of a case are presumed to be in accord with the law. Presumption as to the regularity of the proceedings of courts will always be exercised; errors in such proceedings must always be affirmatively shown. Under these familiar rules we must regard the findings of the court as authorized by the statute, even if it bear the construction insisted upon by defendant's counsel. The motion must be overruled.
III. The findings of the court are as follows:
It will be observed that the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth findings presents conclusions of law. The court also found as a conclusion of law "that the plaintiff is entitled to compensation for all services actually rendered to the public, and for such services he should receive the fees provided by law and paid to the sheriff for like services." Other conclusions of law found by the court relate to the amounts found due the plaintiff upon the several items of his account; they need not be presented here.
The evidence shows without conflict that after the order for the removal of Stewart, no change was made in the business of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial