McCuen v. McGee

Decision Date24 January 1994
Docket NumberNo. 93-581,93-581
Citation315 Ark. 561,868 S.W.2d 503
PartiesW.J. "Bill" McCUEN, et al., Appellants, v. Benjamin L. McGEE, et al., Appellees.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Ronald C. Wilson, West Memphis, for appellants.

Arnold, Grobmyer & Haley, Little Rock, for appellees.

HAYS, Justice.

This action for mandamus and declaratory judgment was brought by Benjamin L. McGee (appellee) to determine whether Ronald Carl Wilson (appellant) was eligible to seek the office of House of Representatives, District 95, Crittenden County, Arkansas, in the general election held in November, 1992. The question we are asked to decide was rendered moot by that election and that resolves the dispute.

In October of 1991 the Board of Apportionment of the State of Arkansas, pursuant to litigation pending in federal district court, 1 adopted a plan of reapportionment redefining several districts of the Arkansas House of Representatives. The plan and attendant maps and exhibits were filed with the Secretary of State in January, 1992. The plan became final in February, 1992, for purposes of the primary and general elections of that year. See Harvey v. Clinton, 308 Ark. 546, 826 S.W.2d 236 (1992).

Under the plan House District 48 of Crittenden County, a single, multi-member district, became two districts--District 95 and 96. The two districts were divided by Judge Smith Drive in the City of Marion--District 95 to the north and District 96 to the south.

Appellee Benjamin L. McGee was elected to the seat representing District 48 at the 1988 election and resided in the successor district, District 95. McGee filed for that position in the Democratic primary of 1992 and was elected without opposition.

On April 29, 1992, Ronald Carl Wilson completed the necessary forms to qualify as an independent candidate for District 95 and filed them with the Secretary of State. Those documents reflected that Wilson resided on the south side of Judge Smith Drive and, hence, in District 96. The Secretary of State certified appellant Wilson's name to the Crittenden County Board of Election Commissioners as an independent candidate for the general election in 1992.

Thereafter appellees McGee and Helen Adams, a registered voter of District 95, petitioned for a writ of mandamus and declaratory judgment in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County to determine on an expedited basis the eligibility of appellant Wilson to be a candidate in District 95. Named as respondents were W.J. "Bill" McCuen, Ronald Carl Wilson and the members of the Board of Election Commissioners of Crittenden County. Following a hearing the trial court found on undisputed testimony that Wilson resided outside District 95 and therefore was not a resident of the district for one year preceding the election as required by Article 5, Section 4 of the Arkansas Constitution. The court declared that Wilson should not have been certified as a candidate in District 95 and that mandamus should issue to remove his name from the ballot or, if impracticable, to refrain from counting any votes cast for him. The trial court rejected Wilson's contention that because District 95 had not been in existence for one year it was impossible to have met the residency requirement of art. 5, § 4.

Ronald Carl Wilson has appealed on four...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Gray v. Thomas-Barnes
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • November 19, 2015
    ...2006) ; Tumey v. Daniels, 359 Ark. 256, 196 S.W.3d 479 (2004) ; Benton v. Bradley, 344 Ark. 24, 37 S.W.3d 640 (2001) ; McCuen v. McGee, 315 Ark. 561, 868 S.W.2d 503 (1994) ; State v. Craighead Cnty. Bd. of Election Comm'rs, 300 Ark. 405, 779 S.W.2d 169 (1989) ). Thus, as a threshold matter,......
  • Trujillo v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 11, 2016
    ...325 Ark. 309, 924 S.W.2d 802 (1996). To do so would be to render advisory opinions, which this court will not do. McCuen v. McGee, 315 Ark. 561, 868 S.W.2d 503 (1994). We have generally held that a case becomes moot when any judgment rendered would have no practical legal effect upon a then......
  • Cotten v. Fooks
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • September 27, 2001
    ...325 Ark. 309, 924 S.W.2d 802 (1996). To do so would be to render advisory opinions, which this court will not do. McCuen v. McGee, 315 Ark. 561, 868 S.W.2d 503 (1994). We have generally held that a case becomes moot when any judgment rendered would have no practical legal effect upon a then......
  • Magnus v. Carr, 02-604.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 24, 2002
    ...93 (1995); Smedley v. Smedley, 319 Ark. 421, 892 S.W.2d 273 (1995); Dougan v. Gray, 318 Ark. 6, 884 S.W.2d 239 (1994); McCuen v. McGee, 315 Ark. 561, 868 S.W.2d 503 (1994); Johnson v. State, 314 Ark. 471, 863 S.W.2d 305 (1993); Jenkins v. Goldsby, 307 Ark. 558, 822 S.W.2d 842 (1992); City o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT