McDaniel v. Allen

Decision Date14 February 1887
Citation64 Miss. 417,1 So. 356
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesE. C. MCDANIEL ET AL. v. J. M. ALLEN

APPEAL from the Chancery Court of Lee County, HON. BAXTER MCFARLAND Chancellor.

In 1881 one Willoughby Bolen died, testate, leaving a widow Margaret, and ten children, one of whom was J. H. Bolen surviving him. The sixth clause of Willoughby Bolen's will was as follows: "I give and bequeath unto my beloved wife, Margaret E. Bolen, the rest and residue of my estate, both real and personal, of any and all description whatever, during the term of her natural life, and upon her death to be divided equally among the heirs of my body." Shortly after the death of the father one of the children died, and in 1882 J. H. Bolen, another child, died without any heirs and without having made any disposition of his property. In 1883 Margaret Bolen, the widow, died. On the petition of J. M. Allen, a creditor of J. H. Bolen, deceased one Anderson was appointed administrator of his estate. Anderson then filed a petition before the Chancellor to have the interest of J. H. Bolen, deceased, in certain lands covered by the sixth clause in the will of Willoughby Bolen sold, and the proceeds devoted to the payment of J. H Bolen's debts, he not having left any personal property. The Chancellor ordered that J. H. Bolen's interest, which was adjudged to be a one-ninth interest, in the lands in question be sold. At this sale J. M. Allen became the purchaser. E. C. McDaniel acquired the interest of W. R. Bolen, another of the children of Willoughby Bolen, deceased, and was also made guardian of several of the minor children of Willoughby Bolen.

J. M. Allen filed his bill for partition of the lands. The Chancellor decreed that Allen was entitled to J. H. Bolen's interest in the lands by virtue of his purchase at the sale, under the former decree above referred to, a one-ninth interest in the lands covered by the sixth clause of Willoughby Bolen's will, and ordered a sale and partition of the same. The defendants appealed.

Decree affirmed.

J. H. Barr, for the appellants.

1. First, J. M. Allen's title being such as was vested in the estate of J. H. Bolen at his death, and by virtue of the will of Willoughby Bolen, the "heirs" of Willoughby Bolen's "body" did not take by purchase, as devisees, a vested remainder after the termination of the freehold estate in the widow, but they take the reversionary interest in the property covered by said sixth clause of the will by descent, their prior right, and this being so, J. H. Bolen having died while the freehold estate in said property was in the widow, and not having either devised or conveyed or otherwise exercised any ownership over any expectant reversionary estate he may have had in same during his lifetime, and dying unmarried and without children, neither his creditors could subject any interest he had in said property, prior to his death, to his debts, nor could any one inherit said property through him, but the inheritance and right to said property must be deraigned through the person who died last seized, who in this case was Willoughby Bolen.

That the heirs referred to in the sixth clause of Willoughby Bolen's will take by descent, and not as devisees, is sustained by an unbroken line of authorities, and is not changed by the statutes of this State.

The rule in such cases is this, that whenever the testator devises an estate to his heir or heirs of his body, either mediately or immediately, in the same proportion that they would take by the laws of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Byrd v. Wallis
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1938
    ...correct. Allen v. Allen, 145 Miss. 368, 110 So. 685; Sehlater v. Lee, 78 So. 700; Shannon v. Riley, 153 Miss. 815, 121 So. 808; MeDaniel v. Allen, 64 Miss. 417. lapsed devise or bequest does not descend to an heir at law as property not disposed of by will, but passes into the residuum. Ham......
  • Scott v. Turner
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 3, 1925
    ... ... 192; Tatham's Estate, 95 A. 520; 1917A. Ann. Cas. 855; ... Schlater v. Lee, 78 So. 700; Harris v ... McLoran, 30 Miss. 533; McDaniel v. Allen, 64 Miss. 417, ... 1 So. 356 ... A ... bequest or devise may be made by mere implication and a ... devise over in case the ... ...
  • Brickell v. Lightcap
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • July 9, 1917
    ... ... quantity. Arnold v. Railway Co., 58 Tex. Civ. App ... 186, 123 S.W. 1162; Allen v. Hughes, 106 Ga. 775, 32 ... S.E. 927; Luquire v. Lee, 121 Ga. 624, 49 S.E. 834; ... Johnson v. Cook, 34 Ala. 150; Nelson v ... Davis, ... 217; Branton v. Buckley, 99 ... Misc. 116, 54 So. 850, L. R. A. 1917C, 527; Dunlap v ... Fant, 74 Miss. 197, 20 So. 874; McDaniel v ... Allen, 64 Miss. 417, 1 So. 356; Bullock v. Downs, 9 H ... L. Cas. 1; Lee v. Lee, 1 Drew & S. 85; Mitchell ... v. Bridges 13 Week ... ...
  • Darrow v. Moore
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • May 16, 1932
    ... ... Henry ... v. Henderson, 101 Miss. 751; Bratton v. Graham, 146 ... Miss. 246 ... Wilson, ... Kyser, Armstrong & Allen, and Julian Wilson, of Memphis, ... Tennessee, for appellants ... The ... object of the Two Donee Statute is to defeat intention; ... of the testator took the estate and not those only who ... survived the tenant for life ... McDaniel ... v. Allen, 64 Miss. 417, 7 So. 358 ... Where a ... testator devised a life estate to his wife and the remainder ... to his children, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT