Mceachern v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co
Decision Date | 22 September 1914 |
Docket Number | (No. 5271.) |
Parties | McEACHERN. v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from City Court of Atlanta; H. M. Reid, Judge.
Action by F. E. McEaehern, executrix, against the New York Life Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff for less than claimed, and she brings error. Reversed.
On October 22, 1898, the New York Life Insurance Company issued a 20 annual payment policy on the life of Robert A. McEachern for $10,000, payable to John H. McEachern, father of the insured, or, "in the event of his prior death, to the insured's executors, administrators, or assigns, " etc., in consideration of the sum of $489, to be paid in advance, and "of the payment of a like sum on the 22d day of October in every year thereafter, " during the continuance of the policy, "until 20 full years' premiums shall have been paid." Certain privileges were guaranteed by the terms of the policy under the head "Special Advantages." Under this heading was a "table of loans and surrender values, " showing the amounts that would be loaned on the policy, and the amount of paid-up insurance and extended insurance to which the insured was entitled at the end of each year from and after the end of the third year. According to this table, at the end of the tenth year the loan value of the policy was $3,600. At the end of the thirteenth year the loan value was $5,420, and the insured was entitled to paid-up insurance to the amount of $6,500, or to have the policy extended for seven years for $10,000. With reference to loans, the policy contained, on the page following the table above mentioned, these stipulations:
Next came a nonforfeiture clause, as follows:
Further provisions of the policy material to the issues involved are as follows:
The following appears from the agreed statement of facts in the brief of the evidence: John H. McEachern, the beneficiary named in the policy, died February 8, 1907, and thereupon the policy became payable to the executors, administrators, or assigns of the insured. On November 27, 1908, the insured obtained a loan of $2,620 from the company, and, to secure the loan, executed a "policy loan agreement, " as follows:
The annual premiums on the policy were paid to and accepted by the company until the one which became due on October 22, 1911. The insured died January 13, 1912. The plaintiff was appointed executrix of his will on January 27, 1912, and, if any one has a right to recover on the policy, the right is in her, as executrix. On November 29, 1911, a check was received by mail at the Charlotte branch office of the insurance company, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Farmers' Mut. Fire Ins. Co. Of Ga. v. Harris
...in making the insurance contract, it was his object to secure." May on Insurance, 192, cited approvingly in McEachern v. N.Y. L. Ins. Co., 15 Ga. App. 222, 82 S. E. 820, 824. "If a policy of insurance is so drawn as to require interpretation, and is fairly susceptible of two dif ferent cons......
-
Fitzsimmons v. American Union Life Ins. Co.
... ... Co ... (Ky.), 113 S.W. 836; New York Life v. Van Meter, ... Adm'r. (Ky.), 121 S.W. 438; New York Life v ... Smith, 35 So. 1004; McEachern v. New York Life, ... 82 S.E. 820; Smith v. Mutual Life, 72 S.W. 935; ... Richardson v. Ashby, 33 S.W. 806; Tennent v ... Union Central ... ...
-
Schmidt v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States
...the loan and interest. To the same effect are Veal v. Security Mutual Life Ins. Co., 6 Ga.App. 721, 65 S.E. 714,McEachern v. New York Life Ins. Co., 15 Ga.App. 222, 82 S.E. 820, and State Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Forrest, 19 Ga.App. 296, 91 S.E. 428. In Afro-American Life Ins. Co. v. La Bert......
-
Fitzsimmons v. Am. Union Life Ins. Co.
...Ins. Co. (Ky.), 113 S.W. 836; New York Life v. Van Meter, Adm'r. (Ky.), 121 S.W. 438; New York Life v. Smith, 35 So. 1004; McEachern v. New York Life, 82 S.E. 820; Smith v. Mutual Life, 72 S.W. 935; Richardson v. Ashby, 33 S.W. 806; Tennent v. Union Central Life, 112 S.W. 754. (2) The court......