McEnery v. McEnery

Decision Date13 December 1899
PartiesMATHEW MCENERY, Appellant, v. WILLIAM J. MCENERY,
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Appeal from Monroe District Court.--HON. M. A. ROBERTS, Judge.

ACTION in equity to reform and to cancel a written contract and a deed conveying certain lands, and for an injunction and an accounting. The defendant's motion to strike certain parts of the petition being sustained, and the plaintiff declining to amend, and electing to stand on his petition judgment was rendered dismissing the same, and for costs from which judgment the plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

T. M. Stuart for appellant.

T. B. Perry for appellee.

GIVEN J. GRANGER, J., not sitting.

OPINION

GIVEN, J.

I.

While the motion is addressed to only eighteen of the twenty paragraphs of the petition, it is equivalent to a motion to strike the entire petition, and, as stated by counsel, presents two questions, namely: "The first is, can the plaintiff prove by parol evidence the matter and things alleged in his petition, against the objection that such evidence contradicts, changes, or adds to the terms of the written contract between the parties, as expressed in Exhibit A (being the deed from plaintiff to defendant)? And, second, do the matters stated in plaintiff's petition constitute a cause of action, or entitle him to any relief?"

The petition is quite lengthy, but the material allegations are in substance, as follows: It shows that the plaintiff was the owner of a two hundred and eighty-acre farm in Monroe county worth eleven thousand dollars, and live stock thereon worth five thousand dollars, and farm implements worth five hundred dollars, and that he resided on this farm for twenty-one years last past. He was a widower (his wife having been dead about fifteen years), and had four children, including the defendant, all of whom were married and living by themselves, excepting the defendant, who, with his family, resided with the plaintiff on said farm. The plaintiff, being aged seventy-eight years, and feeble, desiring to provide a pleasant and permanent home for himself on said farm, and to provide for a division of his property at his death among his children, entered into a verbal agreement with the defendant as follows: "First, that petitioner would, in consideration of said sum of $ 1,800 which he owed the defendant, and in further consideration of the promises and agreements of the said defendant as hereinafter mentioned, convey his said farm to the said defendant on the following terms and conditions, to wit: (1) That the petitioner was to reserve and remain in the possession and exclusive control of his said farm, and the profits and income arising therefrom, so long as he should live, and have the exclusive right to receive and disburse such profits as hereinafter provided. (2) That plaintiff's said stock and farm implements were to be kept and used on said farm and farming business, and that all parts and portions thereof remaining at the time of plaintiff's death should pass to, and become the property of, defendant. (3) That the defendant and his family should live on said farm and keep house for the plaintiff, and cook and wash for him, take care of him in sickness, and do all they reasonably could to render him comfortable. (4) That defendant would, at his own expense, and by his own labor and such other labor as he might furnish, cultivate said farm, and carry on said farming and stock business, keep and feed said stock, and from time to time sell and dispose of portions of the same as directed by the plaintiff. (5) That the profits arising from said farming business, and the income from said farm over and above what might be required for the support and maintenance of the petitioner and defendant and his family, should be paid to the other children of petitioner, until they should each be paid the sum of two thousand dollars ($ 2,000), and that the sums thus set aside to each of said children should be made a lien on said farm." Plaintiff alleges that soon thereafter they applied to an attorney to reduce their agreement to writing, and were advised that as part of their agreement related to real estate, and part to personal property, it would be best to have two written instruments; that thereupon plaintiff executed to defendant the deed set out, conveying said farm, with the understanding and agreement that they would at a future time execute a writing, setting forth the other portions of their agreement. The deed set out conveys said lands to the defendant "for the consideration of two thousand dollars ($ 2,000.00) and natural love and affection." Said deed contains the following: "This conveyance is made subject to the following conditions, stipulations, and reservations, to wit: That I, Mathew McEnery, reserve the right to the possession and control of the said property and of the profits arising therefrom, for and during my natural life; the said profits or income arising from said lands to be applied to my support and maintenance during my natural life, and to the support and maintenance of the said Wm. J. McEnery and his family during my life, and to the payment to my son Michael McEnery, or the heirs of his body, the sum of two thousand dollars, and to my daughter, Ellen Hannan, or the heirs of her body, the sum of two thousand dollars, and to my son Chas. McEnery, or the heirs of his body, the sum of two thousand dollars; the said respective sums of two thousand dollars to be paid as I may direct; and said respective sums, or any part thereof, remaining unpaid at my death to the said children, or heirs of their bodies, as aforesaid, shall be paid within twelve (12) years from date hereof by my son William J. McEnery. Said payments shall be paid in equal parts to each of the parties entitled thereto as aforesaid, and the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT