McGaffee v. McGaffee, 48070
Decision Date | 16 December 1952 |
Docket Number | No. 48070,48070 |
Citation | 56 N.W.2d 36,244 Iowa 879 |
Parties | McGAFFEE v. McGAFFEE et al. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Rehearing Granted as to Division VI of Opinion March 13, 1953.
Lorna L. Williams and Emmert, James, Lindgren & Eller, of Des Moines, for appellant.
Eskil C. Carlson, of Des Moines, for appellees.
Plaintiff was 86 years old and his son, defendant Loren McGaffee 47, at the time of trial. Defendant Gretchen McGaffee is wife of her co-defendant. Long prior to the events involved here plaintiff was engaged in the sheet metal business in Des Moines under the trade name J. F. McGaffee Co. That business was never incorporated.
About 1930 (both parties are indefinite as to the date) plaintiff took his son into the business. 'I told Loren he could come and work for me. * * * I would teach him about pipe work and when we had a chance for a plumbing job he would work under the plumber and learn that trade. * * * and whenever he got the plumbing business so he could do the plumbing work * * * and get a plumber's license * * * I would take him in as a partner.'
Loren testified:
He further said the corporation was later dissolved (1941) and 'we put the two businesses together' about the same time.
Plaintiff testified he furnished the money for organizing the plumbing corporation.
Rev. Henry W. Landis was a minister of the gospel but thriftily claimed also the more worldly title of plumber, with both a master plumber's and a journeyman plumber's license. He testified: Apparently no stock ever issued (authorized capitalization was for $10,000) and there was no actual capital except Plaintiff testified: Loren did not testify on the subject.
Some time after Loren came into the business his wife became bookkeeper for both the sheet metal company and the plumbing corporation at $50 per month from each. Plaintiff said 'From that time on I turned the money from the business and collecting matters over to Gretchen to take care of and to pay the bills and make out the statements and trusted her with everything.' She wrote checks on plaintiff's personal account, made deposits and 'so far as I know * * * balanced the bank statement with the checkbook and picked up the bank statement each month and the cancelled checks.'
Gretchen herself thinks this employment started about 1934 'when it was necessary to pay sales tax to the state of Iowa.' Her testimony substantially corroborates plaintiff's but goes into greater detail. It explains that prior to the dissolution of the plumbing corporation the two businesses kept separate books. with 'but one set of books.'
The various exhibits in the record added some explanatory details to the picture. April 30, 1934, plaintiff, on behalf of J. F. McGaffee Co., applied to the State Board of Assessment and Review (Sales Tax Division) for a permit to engage in the plumbing, sheet metal and furnace business, under 'sole ownership.' The Des Moines Plumbing & Heating Company, Inc., certificate of incorporation issued July 16, 1934. The articles of incorporation show plaintiff had no part in its formation though he financed it except for the 'few tools,' plumber's licenses and customers, contributed by Mr Landis. The articles show only Loren and Landis as incorporators and they only join in the notice of dissolution published June 5, 12, 19, and 26, 1941.
The situation after the plumbing corporation dissolved was not materially different except for a closer merging of the two businesses. Mr. Landis testified he did not think the corporate assets were sufficient to off-set the liabilities. He never received any profits from the corporation ('just the wages I received at different times I worked') and he did not receive any profit and loss statement on dissolution. On April 23, 1942, he in writing assigned to Loren ('operating the Des Moines Plumbing and Heating Co.') a cash deposit of $100 in the hands of the city treasurer registered 'in the name of H. W. Landis (Des Moines Plumbing and Heating Co.)'.
The name of the plumbing company was retained after dissolution of the corporation, the names of both concerns being used as before. In 1944, 1945, and 1946, 'Inspection Reports' to the Iowa State Tax Commission, Division of Retail Sales and Use Tax, were made in the name of the plumbing company by L. E. McGaffee (in 1944 and 1946) and by J. F. McGaffee (in 1945). Each of these gave J. F. McGaffee as individual owner and each said there had been no 'change in ownership since permit was issued.' There are three 'Employer's Reports of Taxable Wages' dated respectively '12-31-45,' '9-30-46,' and '3-31-47.' All are in the name of J. F. McGaffee Co. and all say no 'change of ownership, or other transfer, of the business.'
The real controversy here involves a written 'Assignment and Transfer,' dated July, 1946, and signed in duplicate with the name of both companies 'by James Frank McGaffee'; and signed by James Frank McGaffee, Nina McGaffee, and Loren E. McGaffee, individually. The text of said document is as follows:
'I, James Frank McGaffee, for valuable consideration in hand paid and in compliance with a promise and understanding had and made by me, I do hereby transfer, sell, set over, assign and convey to my son, Loren E. McGaffee all of the shop, stock tools, materials, equipment and all accounts and all rights of every kind and character in and to the business commonly known and J. F. McGaffee Company and Des Moines Plumbing and Heating Company, being a business operated at 1408 Harding Road, Des Moines, Iowa; and
'This conveyance includes all of the tools, equipment, materials and stock stored in the garage at 708 East Sheridan, Des Moines, Iowa, my home;
'This assignment does not convey any real estate but does convey all of the personal property and the good will, et cetera of the said J. F. McGaffee Company and Des Moines Plumbing and Heating Company;
'I, Nina McGaffee, the wife of James Frank McGaffee hereby joins in and consents to the hereinbefore assignment and transfer.
'Des Moines, Iowa, July __, 1946.'
Notwithstanding this transaction defendant Loren McGaffee, under date April 28, 1947, signing as 'partner', made an 'Employer's Contribution and Summary Report' to the Iowa Employment Security Commission on behalf of ' It purported to cover January, February and March, 1947, and to give payroll and wage details for those months. It answered 'no' to an inquiry as to any sale of business.
A similar report, similarly signed, dated July 22, 1947, covered April, May and June 1947. The one dated 10/24/47, for July, August and September, 1947, however, was signed by Loren as 'owner,' but it still listed both men as doing business under the company names.
A partnership Income Tax Return for 'J. F. McGaffee Co. & Des Moines Plbg. & Htg.' for 1946, was signed 'Loren E. McGaffee.' But April 5, 1948, he filed with Iowa Employment Security Commission a 'Report of Employer on acquiring a Business' signed ' under the title 'owner.' And December 31, 1948, he signed and filed two trade name certificates, one for each company, listing himself only as the one 'owning or having any interest in the business.'
A large number of exhibits was produced in contemplation of an accounting in event plaintiff's prayer for cancellation of the so-called assignment and transfer was sustained. The trial court however refused cancellation and upheld the validity of the instrument in question. Plaintiff has appealed from the decree dismissing his...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Peine v. Murphy
...Equity, § 194; Clark Equity, § 310.5; 12 C.J.S. Cancellation of Instruments § 77a, p. 1078; 30 C.J.S. Equity §§ 48-50; McGaffee v. McGaffee, 244 Iowa 879, 56 N.W.2d 36, 58 N.W. 357. 'Equity will not be overnice in balancing the efficacy of one remedy against the efficacy of another, when ac......
-
Mendenhall v. Judy
...(citation omitted). Such a relationship is particularly likely to exist where there is a family relationship. McGaffee v. McGaffee, 244 Iowa 879, 888, 56 N.W.2d 36, 39 (1953). Moreover, a confidential relationship may exist although there is no fiduciary relationship. Oehler v. Hoffman, 253......
-
Lane v. Crescent Beach Lodge & Resort, Inc.
... ... See 1 Am.Jur.2d Accounts and Accounting § 63; 1 C.J.S. Accounting §§ 22, 41--45; cf. McGaffee ... ...
-
Salem v. Salem
...condition and plaintiff is entitled only to a money judgment rather than the cancellation of the deed. We are cited to McGaffee v. McGaffee, Iowa, 56 N.W.2d 36, 41. It is true in Division VI of the first opinion in the McGaffee case we found a money judgment was the only relief we could giv......