McGaha v. State
| Decision Date | 30 September 1935 |
| Docket Number | 31699 |
| Citation | 163 So. 442,173 Miss. 829 |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | MCGAHA v. STATE |
1 LARCENY.
Indictment or affidavit for larceny must allege ownership of property stolen.
2. CRIMINAL LAW.
Where affidavit for petit larceny was void for failing to allege ownership of property stolen, defect could be availed of for first time on appeal.
HON THOS. H. JOHNSTON, Judge.
APPEAL from circuit court of Alcorn county HON. THOS. H. JOHNSTON Judge.
Oscar McGaha was convicted of petit larceny, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Orma R. Smith, of Corinth, for appellant.
Ownership of the property stolen is an essential ingredient and element of the crime of larceny; the property must be the property of another.
Sec. 1010, Code of 1930; 17 R. C. L., p. 5, sec. 1, p. 22, sec. 25; 36 C. J., p. 734, sec. 1, p. 756, sec. 74; Unger v. State, 42 Miss. 642; Const. of the State of Miss., sec. 26.
Ownership of the property alleged to have been stolen is an essential ingredient and element of the crime of larceny and must be alleged in the affidavit or indictment; and if it is not, the affidavit or indictment is fatally defective, absolutely void and charges no offense whatsoever.
Wright v. State, 94 So. 716, 130 Miss. 603; 17 R. C. L., p. 60, sec. 66; 36 C. J., p. 828, sec. 307; Unger v. State, 42 Miss. 642; State v. Tatum, 96 Miss. 430, 50 So. 490; Jordan v. State, 87 Miss. 170, 39 So. 895; Hughes v. State, 74 Miss. 368, 20 So. 838; Reed v. State, 156 So. 650; Cook v. State, 72 Miss. 517, 17 So. 228; Taylor v. State, 74 Miss. 544, 21 So. 129; Pipin v. State, 126 Miss. 146, 88. So. 502; Woodward v. State, 130 Miss. 611, 94 So. 717; State of W.Va. v. Cutlip, L.R.A. 1916E, 783; Wallace v. Peoples, 63 Ill. 451, 88 A.L.R., p. 486, note.
The fact that the appellant failed to make any objection in the court below to this fatal defect in the affidavit does not preclude him from objecting in this court on appeal for the first time.
Secs. 1206, 1193, Code of 1930.
Where an affidavit absolutely charges no offense and is void the question may be raised upon appeal for the first time.
Reed v. State, 156 So. 650; Hughes v. State, 74 Miss. 368, 20 So. 838; Cook v. State, 72 Miss. 517, 17 So. 228; Herron v. State, 118 Miss. 429, 79 So. 289; Newcomb v. State, 37 Miss. 383; Jessee v. State, 28 Miss. 100; Pittman v. State, 107 Miss. 154, 65 So. 123.
W. D. Conn, Jr., assistant attorney-general, for the state.
Since the failure to allege ownership is not a formal defect, but one of substance, the statute does not preclude this matter from being raised after verdict.
Reed v. State, 171 Miss. 65, 156 So. 650.
In view of the holding of the court in the Reed case the state submits that this case should be similarly disposed of.
The appellant, Oscar McGaha, was convicted of petit larceny and sentenced to serve sixty days in jail upon an affidavit as follows: etc.
There was no demurrer to the affidavit and no motion in arrest of judgment, but an appeal has been taken, and it is contended that the affidavit is fatally defective, in that it fails to charge that the property stolen belonged to anyone, and no attempt is made to allege ownership of the property stolen.
In Hughes v. State, 74 Miss. 368, 20 So. 838, it was held that the failure to show ownership of the property stolen is a defect of substance and not form, and may be taken advantage of by motion in arrest of judgment as well as by demurrer before trial.
In Reed v. State, 171 Miss. 65, 156 So. 650, it was held that a fatal defect in an indictment or affidavit may be availed of on appeal for the first time.
It is necessary for an indictment or affidavit to allege ownership of the property stolen, that being the essence of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Johnson v. State
... ... Property ... and ownership are inseparable. There must be ownership ... charged, either general or special ... Bishop's ... New Crim. Law, secs. 788, 789, 790 ... Ownership ... in larceny must be proved as laid ... McGaha ... v. State, 173 Miss. 829, 163 So. 442; Hughes v ... State, 74 Miss. 368, 20 So. 838; McDowell v ... State, 8 So. 508 ... While ... we understand the rule to be well settled that a conviction ... will be upheld on the evidence of an accomplice unless such ... evidence is ... ...
-
Westmoreland v. State, 46118
...v. State, 72 Miss. 517, 17 So. 228; Hughes v. State, 74 Miss. 368, 20 So. 838; Taylor v. State, 74 Miss. 544, 21 So. 129; McGaha v. State, 173 Miss. 829, 163 So. 442; Robinson v. State, 180 Miss. 774, 178 So. 588; Crosby v. State, 191 Miss. 173, 2 So.2d 813; Kelly v. State, 204 Miss. 79, 36......
-
Rowland v. Stats
... ... was a deadly weapon, and likewise the jury also, the point is ... that the instruction granted the state by the court relieved ... the jury from taking any notice whatever of the character of ... the pistol. The instruction eliminated absolutely from ... [182 Miss. 888] ... Pittman v. State, 107 Miss. 154, 65 So. 123; ... Reed v. State, 171 Miss. 65, 156 So. 650; McGaha v ... State, 173 Miss. 829, 163 So. 442 ... If the ... defect were an amendable one, it cannot be complained of in ... this court for ... ...
-
Langford v. State
...v. State, 72 Miss. 517, 17 So. 228; Hughes v. State, 74 Miss. 368, 20 So. 838; Taylor v. State, 74 Miss. 544, 21 So. 129; McGaha v. State, 173 Miss. 829, 163 So. 442; Robinson v. State, 180 Miss. 774, 178 So. 588; Crosby v. State, 191 Miss. 173, 2 So.2d 813; Kelly v. State, 204 Miss. 79, 36......