McGee v. State, 68277
Decision Date | 05 September 1984 |
Docket Number | No. 68277,68277 |
Citation | 172 Ga.App. 208,322 S.E.2d 500 |
Parties | McGEE v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
James E. Hudson, Kenneth Kalivoda, Athens, for appellant.
Lindsey A. Tise, Jr., Dist. Atty., Barry G. Irwin, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Appellant was indicted for and convicted of first degree homicide by vehicle (OCGA § 40-6-393); driving under the influence of alcohol (OCGA § 40-6-391); failure to render aid (OCGA § 40-6-271); and operating a vehicle without insurance (OCGA § 33-34-12). In this appeal, he questions the omission of two requested instructions from the trial court's jury charge and the admissibility of certain expert testimony.
1. Appellant submitted a written request to the trial court that it charge the jury that "upon the trial of a criminal case the jury is the judge of both the law and the facts." The trial court did not honor appellant's request verbatim; instead, it chose to instruct the jury that Appellant argues that reversible error was committed when his charge which was taken from OCGA § 17-9-2 was not given as requested.
Mullins v. State, 157 Ga.App. 204(6), 276 S.E.2d 877 (1981). Griffin v. State, 154 Ga.App. 261(4), 267 S.E.2d 867 (1980). See also Mims v. State, 188 Ga. 702(4), 4 S.E.2d 831 (1939). Inasmuch as the instruction given by the trial court was a "proper interpretation" of the statutory basis of appellant's requested charge, it was not error for the trial court to fail to charge the legal concept now at issue in the language requested by appellant.
2. The trial court also failed to give appellant's requested instruction that "in a criminal case, there is no inference to be drawn from a failure to produce evidence by either side." This requested charge was submitted to the trial court subsequent to and in response to the district attorney's closing argument in which he pointed out to the jury the failure of the defense to produce several potential defense witnesses. Appellant asserts that the trial court's refusal to give the requested instruction allowed the State to create an inference of guilt from appellant's failure to produce the "missing" evidence.
The closing argument of the district attorney was not improper. Wilson v. Zant, 249 Ga. 373(4), 290 S.E.2d 442 (1982); Shirley v. State, 245 Ga. 616(1), 266 S.E.2d 218 (1980); Chancellor v. State, 165 Ga.App. 365(26), 301 S.E.2d 294 (1983). However, appellant's requested charge which directs a jury that it cannot infer anything from a failure by either side to produce evidence is not a correct statement of the law. While the jury may not be instructed to infer guilt from a defendant's failure to produce evidence, the jury may be apprised of facts from which it arrives at the same conclusion. Pritchard v. State, 160 Ga.App. 105(4), 286 S.E.2d 338 (1981). Appellant's proposed instruction would infringe upon the jury's ability to draw conclusions from the facts...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Parker v. State
...error for the trial court to fail to charge the legal concept now at issue in the language requested by appellant. McGee v. State, 172 Ga.App. 208(1), 322 S.E.2d 500 (1984). 4. Parker contends the trial court erred by charging the jury, at the State's request, that a reckless disregard for ......
-
Heath v. State
...204 Ga. 345, 352(3), 49 S.E.2d 886 (1948); Pritchard v. State, 160 Ga.App. 105, 108(4), 286 S.E.2d 338 (1981); McGee v. State, 172 Ga.App. 208, 209(2), 322 S.E.2d 500 (1984); Brown v. State, 177 Ga.App. 284, 288(4), 339 S.E.2d 332 Weighing all of the circumstances revealed by the evidence w......
-
Carter v. State, s. A96A1712
...the exact language requested when the charge given adequately covers the correct legal principles. (Cits.)' [Cit.]" McGee v. State, 172 Ga.App. 208(1), 322 S.E.2d 500 (1984). The wording of the charge did not constitute an expression of opinion. OCGA § Carter and Scott also both objected af......
-
Armstrong v. State, A01A1343.
...principles. (Cits.)" (Punctuation omitted.) Parker v. State, 270 Ga. 256, 258(3), 507 S.E.2d 744 (1998), citing McGee v. State, 172 Ga.App. 208(1), 322 S.E.2d 500 (1984). After reviewing Armstrong's requested charge and the charge as given, we conclude that the pattern charge fairly covered......
-
Pre-trial preparation
...a specific question based on the facts of the drinking driver case in evidence, and can render an opinion therefrom. See McGee v. State , 322 S.E.2d 500 (Ga. App. 1984). It may be necessary to use the hypothetical question because the court, in its discretion, may sequester the defense expe......
-
A Better Orientation for Jury Instructions - Charles M. Cork, Iii
...v. State, 270 Ga. 256, 258-59, 507 S.E.2d 744, 747 (1998); Harris v. State, 190 Ga. 258, 260, 9 S.E.2d 183, 185 (1940); McGee v. State, 172 Ga. App. 208, 208-09, 322 S.E.2d 500, 501 (1984). For this reason, it is not error to refuse to instruct that the jury is the "judge of the law" becaus......