McGehee v. Mata

Decision Date13 April 1976
Docket NumberNo. 75--843,75--843
Citation330 So.2d 248
PartiesClara McGEHEE, Appellant, v. Francisco MATA and Dora Mata, Individually and d/b/a Cuba Wig Import, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Guillermo F. Mascaro, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Lopez & Harris, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals an adverse final summary judgment in this action for an accounting and return of money invested in defendants' wig business.

Upon the alleged representation of the defendants, Francisco and Dora Mata, that their wig business yielded a 30% Net return and they would return her initial investment within seven months, plaintiff, Clara McGehee, paid the Matas $7,888.15 for a 1/3 partnership interest in Cuba Wig Imports. Later this business was changed from a partnership to a corporation and Ms. McGehee received 3,333 shares of stock. When her initial investment was not returned, Ms. McGehee demanded from the Matas the $7,888.15 and threatened to take legal action. The attorneys for the respective parties then entered into settlement negotiations which resulted in the Matas forwarding to Ms. McGehee's attorney a $3,000 check enclosed in a letter (dated September 23, 1974) which reads in pertinent part:

'1. Enclosed I am forwarding check in the sum of $3,000.00 payable to Francisco Mata and Dora E. Mata, his wife, and endorsed over to your client, in full compliance with the terms of our agreement.

'2. I would expect to receive from you the original certificate evidencing Mrs. McGehee as being a stockholder of the corporation, duly assigned in the back thereof. I would like to have one witness to the aforesaid assignment.

'3. An executed release by Mrs. McGehee to the corporation and also to Mr. Francisco Mata and Dora E. Mata, his wife.

'4. Resignation of Mrs. McGehee as a director and officer of the corporation. I would like to have a witness, at least, attesting to the execution of the instrument of resignation.

'I believe that upon receipt of the foregoing, this matter has been effectively dealt with and to the satisfaction of everybody concerned. I look forward to receiving the above instruments, and in the meantime, I remain,'

Ms. McGehee cashed the check, endorsed her 3,333 shares of stock over to the Matas and signed a resignation as a director and officer of the corporation. Nevertheless, she refused to execute a release in favor of the Matas.

Ms. McGehee then filed...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Hannah v. James A. Ryder Corp.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 26 Febrero 1980
    ...19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited. Ryder, however, citing Sanford v. Abrams, 24 Fla. 181, 2 So. 373 (1887) and McGehee v. Mata, 330 So.2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), invokes the established doctrine that an accord and satisfaction results as a matter of law when an offeree accepts a paymen......
  • Colony Ins. Co. v. G & E TIRES & SERVICE, INCORPORATED
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 Diciembre 2000
    ...to finance manifested acceptance of the terms on which Colony's offer to pay for the defense was tendered. Cf. McGehee v. Mata, 330 So.2d 248, 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Colony is entitled to The order denying appellant's motion for an award of attorney's fees and costs is reversed, and the ca......
  • Miller v. Perez
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 27 Abril 1988
    ...release of appellant acted as an accord and satisfaction as to all claims of appellee against appellant. It relies on McGehee v. Mata, 330 So.2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Pino v. Lopez, 361 So.2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. dismissed 365 So.2d 714 (Fla.1978); and Yelen v. Cindy's, Inc., 386 So.2......
  • Constr. Consulting, Inc. v. Dist. Bd. of Trs. of Broward Coll.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 7 Septiembre 2022
    ...and final payment for all goods, services and claims to date" was an accord and satisfaction as a matter of law); McGehee v. Mata , 330 So. 2d 248, 248–49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (holding that an accord and satisfaction occurred upon the plaintiff cashing the defendants’ check where, as part of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT