McGlothlin v. Coody
Citation | 59 S.W.2d 819 |
Decision Date | 03 May 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 1406-6040.,1406-6040. |
Parties | McGLOTHLIN v. COODY et al. |
Court | Supreme Court of Texas |
Ratliff & Ratliff, of Haskell, for plaintiff in error.
D. J. Brookreson, of Benjamin, for defendants in error.
We take the following statement of this case from the application for the writ of error:
The application was granted on the conflicts alleged principally by reason of the alleged conflict with the case of Blum v. Keyser, 8 Tex. Civ. App. 675, 28 S. W. 561.
Articles 5447, 5448, and 5449, R. C. S. 1925, necessarily control the only question involved, and the law of this case depends upon a proper construction of those articles. These articles are as follows:
However, the articles involved here are 5447 and 5448, and it appears that, according to the provisions of article 5447 the clerk of a court, upon an application having been made, shall make out, certify, and deliver to the applicant an abstract of judgment, showing five different things, the first of which is that the abstract shall show the names of the plaintiffs in the judgment, and of the defendants in the judgment, not the name of one of the plaintiffs, and not the name of one of the defendants, but the names of the several defendants, if there...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Reynolds v. Kessler
...to the judgment, both plaintiff and defendant, must appear in the index in alphabetical order to effectuate a judgment lien. McGlothlin v. Coody, 59 S.W.2d 819 (Tex.Com.App. Sec. B 1933, judgment adopted); Guaranty State Bank of Donna v. Marion County National Bank, 293 S.W. 248 (Tex.Civ.Ap......
-
Gary E. Patterson & Associates v. Holub
...lien will attach." Hoffman, McBryde & Co., P.C. v. Heyland, 74 S.W.3d 906, 909 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2002, pet. denied); accord McGlothlin v. Coody, 59 S.W.2d 819, 820 (Tex. Comm'n App.1933, judgm't adopted); Olivares v. Nix Trust, 126 S.W.3d 242, 248 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2003, pet. denied). co......
-
IN RE HERMAN
...abstract of judgment invalid because it did not include in the abstract the name of each defendant in the judgment; McGlothlin v. Coody, 59 S.W.2d 819 (Tex.Com.App.1933) affirming a finding that an abstract of judgment that identified only one of the two defendants against whom a judgment h......
-
Texas Building & Mortgage Co. v. Morris
...197 S.W. 1118; Noble v. Barner, 22 Tex.Civ.App. 357, 55 S.W. 382; Askey v. Power, Tex.Com.App., 36 S.W.2d 446; McGlothlin v. Coody, Tex. Com.App., 59 S.W.2d 819. If, within the meaning of Art. No. 5447, the Bank's bid of $1,000 for the Harris County property was a credit on its judgment as ......