McGowan v. Estate of Wright

Decision Date03 February 1988
Docket NumberNo. 57424,57424
Citation524 So.2d 308
PartiesLucille McGOWAN, Individually and on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of John L. McGowan v. The ESTATE OF Ruby C. WRIGHT, Deceased, and A.J. Reese, as Administrator.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

Polly J. Covington, Peter K. Smith, Ltd., Quitman, for appellant.

Thomas R. Jones, Bourdeaux & Jones, Meridian, for appellee.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and PRATHER and ZUCCARO, JJ.

ROY NOBLE LEE, Chief Justice, for the Court:

Lucille McGowan, widow of John L. McGowan, Deceased, and A.J. Reese, Administrator of the Estate of John L. McGowan, deceased intestate, filed suit against the Estate of Ruby C. Wright in the Circuit Court of Clarke County, Mississippi, for damages, actual and punitive, as a result of the wrongful death of McGowan. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of nineteen hundred fifty-nine dollars fifty cents ($1,959.50), the exact amount of the funeral expenses and ambulance fees, and judgment was entered by the lower court in that amount. The plaintiffs have appealed and assign six (6) errors in the trial below.

On January 20, 1982, John L. McGowan was riding in 1970 Buick automobile owned and driven by Ruby C. Wright in a southerly direction on Mississippi State Highway 11. Jessie L. Hayden was driving his pickup truck in a northerly direction in the northbound lane of the highway, and the vehicles were approaching and meeting each other. The vehicles collided head-on in the northbound lane, resulting in the instant death of McGowan. Ruby C. Wright died eight (8) days later.

On September 30, 1985, this suit was filed against the Estate of Ruby C. Wright, Deceased, seeking actual and punitive damages for the wrongful death of McGowan. The case was heard March 13-14, 1986, and the trial judge granted a peremptory instruction on liability in favor of the appellants. The only question this Court deems necessary to answer is whether the damages were adequate and whether the judgment should be set aside and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages alone.

PUNITIVE DAMAGES

Punitive damages may be recovered in proper cases. In Bryant v. Alpha Entertainment Corp., 508 So.2d 1094 (Miss.1987), the Court defined those circumstances under which punitive damages are allowable:

In negligence cases this Court has held "punitive damages are allowable only upon proof of gross negligence or willful misconduct." Jesco, Inc. v. Shannon, 451 So.2d 694, 704 (Miss.1984); Miss. Power Co. v. Jones, 369 So.2d 1381 (Miss.1979); Fowler Butane Gas Co. v. Varner, 244 Miss. 130, 141 So.2d 226 (1962). "Punitive damages are ordinarily recoverable only in cases where negligence is so gross as to indicate a wanton disregard for the safety of others." U.S. Industries v. McClure Furniture Co., 371 So.2d 391, 393 (Miss.1979).

508 So.2d at 1098. See also Gardner v. Jones, 464 So.2d 1144, 1148 (Miss.1985); Consolidated American Life Ins. Co. v. Toche, 410 So.2d 1303, 1304-05 (Miss.1982).

The lower court granted punitive damages Instruction No. P-5 at the request of the plaintiff, which follows:

Punitive damages are added damages awarded for public service in bringing a wrongdoer to account, as an example to warn and deter others from repeating the same act. They are never awarded to benefit the injured party or as a matter of right, but rather to punish and to compel the wrongdoer to have due and proper regard for the rights of the public.

Punitive damages may be awarded Plaintiff if you find that the Defendant's reckless acts, if any, were committed by gross negligence indicative of a wanton and wilful disregard of the rights of others.

The evidence indicates that neither vehicle was exceeding the lawful speed limit, but the collision occurred in the northbound lane, not the proper lane of travel for Ruby C. Wright, just past a one-street intersection (another northbound street intersected Highway 11 at this juncture).

The award of punitive damages is within the discretion of the jury, which has very wide latitude in determining whether punitive damages should be granted and, if so, the amount of those damages. The jury may have concluded that, even though the collision occurred in Ruby Wright's wrong lane, she was guilty of only simple negligence. The punitive damage Instruction P-5 told the jury in part "They are never awarded to benefit the injured party or as a matter of right, but rather to punish and to compel the wrongdoer to have due and proper regard for the rights of the public." The jury may have concluded that, since the wrongdoer Ruby Wright lost her own life, such was punishment enough.

At any rate, the judgment may not be set aside, the jury having been properly instructed on the law of punitive damages.

ACTUAL DAMAGES

John L. McGowan was sixty-seven (67) years old at the time of his death with a life expectancy of 13.6 years. His annual income consisted of one hundred sixty-eight dollars ($168.00) per month Social Security and two hundred forty-one dollars ($241.00) per month via Veterans' Administration benefits, aggregating four hundred nine dollars ($409.00) per month. Lucille McGowan, the widow, testified that the amount of income received by the deceased would be required to support himself; and that it was not enough to support her.

Lucille McGowan testified in her own behalf. She and John L. McGowan were married October 30, 1943. No children were born of the marriage. John went into the service during World War II and was stationed at Ft. Devens, Massachusetts. Subsequently, Lucille moved to New York and for approximately nine (9) months, prior to John's reassignment overseas, she was able to see him on weekends. Thereafter, she began working in a factory to support herself and was so employed until approximately one (1) year after the accident in which John lost his life. John returned from overseas in February or March, 1946, and since that time, John and Lucille had lived apart. Intermittently, over the years, appellant visited John. Particular times were in 1950, 1955, 1958, and 1971. John never visited her. She and John had only spoken over the telephone for the last eleven (11) years of his life. The last time she saw him was in 1971.

Appellant produced only one item of writing she had received from John, a Christmas card mailed to her in 1981. She had no explanation for the lack of mail correspondence.

John McGowan, the deceased, and Ruby C. Wright had lived together for approximately fifteen (15) years. At the time of his death, McGowan was living with Ruby Wright in her house trailer. According to Mary Gaddis, Ruby Wright's sister, Wright and McGowan had "lived like husband and wife" for the 15 years prior to their deaths.

The jury verdict in the sum of $1,959.50 in actual damages represented the aggregate sum of eighteen hundred ninety-five dollars ($1,895.00) funeral expenses and sixty-four dollars fifty cents ($64.50) ambulance fees.

Instruction P-4 submitted to the jury the following elements of damages:

1. Present net cash value at the time of his death of John L. McGowan's life expectancy.

2. Ambulance bill in the sum of $64.50 incurred by his estate.

3. Funeral and burial expenses in the sum of $1,895.00 incurred by his estate.

4. Damages for the loss of society and companionship are allowable even though Mr. and Mrs. McGowan were not living together as a family unit at the time of his death,....

The jury had all the facts before it on the question of damages for the loss of society and companionship and saw and heard appellant Lucille McGowan testify as to that element of damage. The jury obviously concluded that appellant had no loss of society and companionship and, therefore, suffered no damage.

Instruction D-8 defined the present net cash value of John McGowan's life expectancy, which included reduction of his gross annual income by the amount he would have spent on his own personal living expenses, and, again, the jury obviously concluded that there was no net cash value to his life expectancy.

Mississippi Code Annotated Sec. 11-7-13 (Supp.1984), provides that in a wrongful death action the party or parties suing shall recover such damages as the jury may determine to be just, taking into consideration all the damages of every kind to the decedent and all the damages of every kind to any and all parties interested in the suit. This statutory language has been held to include (1) the present net cash value of the life expectancy of the deceased, (2) the loss of the companionship and society of the decedent, (3) the pain and suffering of the decedent between the time of injury and death, and (4) punitive damages. Jesco, Inc. v. Whitehead, 451 So.2d 706, 710 (Miss.1984); Sheffield v. Sheffield, 405 So.2d 1314, 1318 (Miss.1981); Dickey v. Parham, 331 So.2d 917, 918-919 (Miss.1976); Thornton v. Ins. Co. of North America, 287 So.2d 262, 265 (Miss.1973); Scott v. K-B Photo Service, Inc., 260 So.2d 842, 844 (Miss.1972); Boyd Constr. Co. v. Bilbro, 210 So.2d 637, 643 (Miss.1968).

The verdict of the jury reflects that the only damages sustained by the appellant were the funeral expenses and ambulance fees to the estate of the deceased, which were proper items of recovery, and that there were no damages sustained by the widow, Lucille McGowan. We are unable to say that the jury verdict reflects passion or prejudice in the failure to return damages for the appellant Lucille McGowan. Under the facts of this case, it is not shocking to the judicial conscience.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON, GRIFFIN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.

ROBERTSON, Justice, dissenting from denial of petition for rehearing:

At issue in this case is the measure of damages recoverable for the wrongful death of John L. McGowan. At the time of his death McGowan was 67...

To continue reading

Request your trial
40 cases
  • Koestler for Ben. of Koestler, In re
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 31 d1 Agosto d1 1992
    ...companionship and, as well, loss of the value of continuing to live, see Jones v. Shaffer, 573 So.2d 740 (Miss.1990); McGowan v. Estate of Wright, 524 So.2d 308 (Miss.1988), and, as well, that the fault of UM Raiford was without dispute, CRE and Federal were each at substantial risk. It was......
  • 66 Federal Credit Union v. Tucker
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 21 d4 Agosto d4 2003
    ...of the deceased, the pain and suffering of the deceased between injury and death, and punitive damages. See McGowan v. Estate of Wright, 524 So.2d 308, 311 (Miss. 1988). We decline to draw a line at viability. The wrongful death statute creates a general cause of action and designates its b......
  • Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 29 d2 Agosto d2 1995
    ...but rather to punish and to compel the wrongdoer to have due and proper regard for the rights of the public. McGowan v. Estate of Wright, 524 So.2d 308, 310 (Miss.1988); see also Wesson v. United States, 48 F.3d 894, 899-900 (5th Cir.1995) (examining nature of punitive damages under Mississ......
  • Thompson v. Love
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 28 d4 Setembro d4 1995
    ...the exact anomaly confronted by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Williams. See Miss.Code Ann. § 11-7-13 (Supp.1994); McGowan v. Estate of Wright, 524 So.2d 308, 311 (Miss.1988). Accordingly, the legislature may wish to address this issue and simultaneously address all concerns under the cause ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Preparing for Trial in Federal Court
    • 4 d2 Maio d2 2010
    ...F.2d 1539 (10th Cir. 1991), §12:07.3 McGhee v. Arabian Am. Oil Co. , 871 F.2d 1412 (9th Cir. 1989), §8:11 McGowan v. Estate of Wright , 524 So.2d 308, 311 (Miss.1988), Form 6-15 McGraw-Edison Company v. Walt Disney Productions, 787 F.2d 1163, 1172-1173 (7th Cir. 1986), Form 7-10 McGraw-Edis......
  • Experts
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Preparing for Trial in Federal Court
    • 4 d2 Maio d2 2010
    ...cases is generally limited to four general areas, none of which refers to loss of the enjoyment of life. McGowan v. Estate of Wright , 524 So.2d 308, 311 (Miss.1988). These four general areas are: 1. The present net cash value of the life expectancy of the deceased, 2. The loss of the compa......
  • A Bridging Document About Hedonic Loss
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 21-2, February 1992
    • Invalid date
    ...Damages and Personal Injury: A Conceptual Approach," 3 Journal of Forensic Economics 1 (Winter 1990); McGowen v. Estate of Wright, 524 So.2d 308 (Miss. 1988); McDougald v. Garber, 536 N.E.2d 371 (N.Y. 1989), modifying, 135 A.2d 80 (N.Y. 1988). 2. Berla, supra, note 1. 3. Id. at 2. 4. Id. at......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT