McGowan v. United States, 20450.

Decision Date15 October 1963
Docket NumberNo. 20450.,20450.
Citation323 F.2d 655
PartiesThomas J. McGOWAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

David W. Palmer, Crestview, Fla., for appellant.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Edith House, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Meyer Rothwacks, Martin B. Cowan, Melva M. Graney, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., William A. Meadows, Jr., U. S. Atty., Lavinia L. Redd, Asst. U. S. Atty., for the United States.

Before RIVES and JONES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, Jr., District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The facts involved in this appeal and the applicable law are well set forth in the findings and conclusions of the district court. 222 F.Supp. 329. We are in agreement with the district court and its judgment is

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Bombardier Aerospace Corp. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 25 Julio 2016
    ...specifically addressing the prerequisites rule, we agreed with the district court's ruling on a subsequent appeal. McGowan v. United States , 323 F.2d 655 (5th Cir. 1963).In sum, the district court's interpretation of Section 6415(a) is consistent with the statute's plain language and with ......
  • United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company, 8825.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 17 Octubre 1963

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT