McGuire v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Decision Date13 February 1932
Citation46 S.W.2d 53
PartiesMcGUIRE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO.
CourtTennessee Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Davidson County; A. B. Neil, Judge.

Action by Virgil McGuire against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

C. H. Rutherford, James W. Rutherford, and C. H. Rutherford, Jr., all of Nashville, for plaintiff in error.

G. S. Moore, of Nashville, for defendant in error.

McKINNEY, J.

There is involved in this controversy the double indemnity provision of a life insurance policy for $241.70, which is as follows:

"Upon receipt of due proof that the Insured, after attaining age 15 and prior to attaining age 70, has sustained, after the date of this Policy, bodily injuries, solely through external, violent and accidental means, resulting, directly and independently of all other causes, in the death of the Insured within ninety days after the date of such bodily injuries while this Policy is in force, and while premiums are not in default beyond the grace period specified in this Policy, the Company will pay in addition to any other sums due under this Policy and subject to the provisions of this Policy an Accidental Death Benefit equal to the face amount of insurance then payable at death, except that if such bodily injuries are sustained by the Insured while employed in or on the premises of any open pit or underground mine, or are sustained by the Insured while on or about the premises or right of way of any railroad company while the Insured is following the occupation of gang, track, or roadway laborer, track walker, yard, freight, or mixed train brakeman or flagman, then the Accidental Death Benefit shall be only one-half of the face amount of insurance then payable at death. In any case, the amount of the accidental Death Benefit shall be reduced by the amount of any Disability Benefit which has become payable under this Policy on account of the same injuries as resulted in death."

The case was heard upon a stipulation of facts. After reciting that the insured, Herschell McGuire, and his three confederates had robbed several stores in Nashville on the night in question, it contains the following statement: "That they left and went to 28th Avenue North, and Clifton Pike, about 10 o'clock, the same night for the purpose of robbing another Hill's Grocery Store at that place; that they robbed the store, Herschell McGuire taking the money out of the cash register; that while they were robbing the store two police officers came running up and started shooting without saying anything; and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Motley v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 91-2290-KHV.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • August 6, 1993
    ...(1939) (death from police gunshot wound received in course of attempted burglary by insured not accidental); McGuire v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 164 Tenn. 32, 46 S.W.2d 53 (1932) (death from gunshot wound received in course of robbery not accidental).7 Under this standard, Mr. Motley's d......
  • Falster v. Travelers Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • March 4, 1965
    ...policy. The rule stated in the Distretti case has been approved and applied by this Court many times. See McGuire v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 164 Tenn. 32, 46 S.W.2d 53, Winton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 174 Tenn. 252, 124 S.W.2d 712, Baker v. National Life & Accident Insur......
  • Berne v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 1939
    ...of Appeals and denying the writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court of Tennessee referred to the recent cases of McGuire v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 164 Tenn. 32, 46 S.W.2d 53; and Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Distretti, 159 Tenn. 138, 17 S. W.2d In the McGuire case, supra, it was held that one ......
  • Farrell v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • February 24, 1950
    ...this occasion, there was no question for the jury.' The Supreme Court followed this statement of the rule in McGuire v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 164 Tenn. 32, 46 S.W.2d 53; and in Winton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 174 Tenn. 252, 124 S.W.2d 5 Couch Cyclopedia of Insurance La......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT