McIntire v. State, 78-101

Decision Date27 February 1980
Docket NumberNo. 78-101,78-101
Citation381 So.2d 1154
PartiesMichael P. McINTIRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. /T4-43.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James M. Russ and I. Paul Mandelkern of Law Offices of James M. Russ, Orlando, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John D. Cecilian, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

SHARP, Judge.

The Appellant was convicted in the trial court of the felony offense of delivery of cannabis in excess of five grams. Testimony at trial revealed that the weight of the cannabis, including stems but excluding stalks, was seven grams. Subsequent to Appellant's conviction the Florida Supreme Court rendered it's decision in Purifoy v. State, 359 So.2d 446 (Fla.1978). The Court held that because there is no difference between stems and stalks, the measuring of cannabis should exclude both stems and stalks. Disposition of a case on appeal should be made in accordance with the law in effect at the time of the appellate decision rather than the law in effect at the time the judgment was rendered. Hendeles v. Sanford Auto Auction, Inc., 364 So.2d 467 (Fla.1978). In applying Purifoy to the case at bar we find the evidence insufficient to prove delivery of cannabis in excess of five grams. The evidence, however, does support a conviction for the lesser included offense of delivery of not more than five grams of cannabis, a misdemeanor of the first degree. Sec. 893.13, Fla.Stat. (1977).

We REVERSE AND REMAND to the trial court with directions for entry of a judgment of conviction for the lesser included offense of delivery of not more than five grams of cannabis. Sec. 924.34, Fla.Stat. (1973).

DAUKSCH, C. J., and UPCHURCH, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Marrero v. State, 84-1138
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 8, 1985
    ...cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924, 99 S.Ct. 1254, 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979); McGoff v. State, 450 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); McIntire v. State, 381 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Applying the relevant threshold test of entrapment to the facts developed in the record before us, we conclude that the......
  • Jordan v. State, AG-66
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 10, 1982
    ...20 ounces, but gross weight included weight of burlap and plastic bags, as well as weight of stems and stalks); McIntire v. State, 381 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), (conviction of possession of more than 5 grams reversed where cannabis weighed 7 grams, including stems, but not including s......
  • Reed v. State, 89-1525
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 19, 1990
    ...489 So.2d 18 (Fla.1986); State v. Castillo, 486 So.2d 565 (Fla.1986); Wheeler v. State, 344 So.2d 244 (Fla.1977); McIntire v. State, 381 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). This principle, that the law in effect at the time of appeal should be applied, is applicable to motions for rehearing. Se......
  • McDaniels v. State, 79-949
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 27, 1980
    ...of possession of a short-barrelled shotgun and must be proved. Cf. Purifoy v. State, 359 So.2d 446 (Fla.1978); McIntire v. State, 381 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Judicial notice may be taken of matters that are commonly known, but may not be used to dispense with proof of essential fact......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT