Mcintire v. White

Decision Date19 May 1898
Citation50 N.E. 524,171 Mass. 170
PartiesMcINTIRE v. WHITE et al.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

G.R. Swasey and E.O. Thayer, for plaintiff.

John Lowell, for defendant.

OPINION

HOLMES, J.

This is an action of tort for personal injuries. The plaintiff was in the employ of the defendants, and had been sent upstairs to a room in a new part of their shop, to which the public as yet had not had access. On her return she took a different way from that by which she went, and started down a winding staircase, which also was not open to the public at the time. The stairs were new, and had been treated with oil or shellac. To protect them while drying, a loose piece of pasteboard had been placed upon each step, not covering it quite equally, the step not being of equal width throughout. The plaintiff tripped or slipped on one of the pieces of pasteboard when part way down the stairs, fell, and broke her ankle. The staircase was light, and the plaintiff understood the arrangement and its purpose.

We are of opinion that the facts would not warrant a jury in finding the defendants guilty of any breach of duty, and that the presiding judge rightly directed a verdict for the defendants. There was no concealed danger. There was nothing of which the plaintiff could have been warned which she did not know already. The device adopted to protect the stairs was a familiar and proper one. There was, at least, no greater likelihood of harm than in the case of brass-covered stairs where the brass was worn smooth. Crafter v. Railway Co., L.R. 1 C.P. 300.

Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Capstick v. Sayman Products Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • December 31, 1930
    ...Koenig v. Heitz, 282 S.W. 107; Chilberg v. Furniture Co., 34 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1079; Reeves v. 14th Street Store, 96 N.Y. Supp. 448; McIntire v. White, 50 N.E. 524; Weller v. Gas Co., 198 N.Y. 98; Tryon v. Chalmers, 200 N.Y. Supp. 362, 148 N.E. 713; Abbott v. Country Club, 207 N.Y. Supp. 183; H......
  • Capstick v. T. M. Sayman Products Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • December 31, 1930
    ... ... Heitz, 282 S.W. 107; Chilberg v ... Furniture Co., 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1079; Reeves v. 14th ... Street Store, 96 N.Y.S. 448; McIntire v. White, 50 ... N.E. 524; Weller v. Gas Co., 198 N.Y. 98; Tryon ... v. Chalmers, 200 N.Y.S. 362, 148 N.E. 713; Abbott v ... Country Club, ... ...
  • Johnson v. Ambursen Hydraulic Constructing Company
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • January 30, 1915
    ... ... 435, 100 N.E. 614; Demers v. Marshall, 178 Mass. 9, ... 59 N.E. 454; Wilson v. Mass. Cotton Mills, 169 Mass ... 67, 47 N.E. 506; McIntire v. White et al., 171 Mass ... 170, 50 N.E. 524; Goulding v. Eastern Bridge & Structural ... Co., 210 Mass. 52, 96 N.E. 71; O'Malley v. Gas ... ...
  • Cluett v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • March 13, 1920
    ...Fourteenth Street Store, 110 App. Div. 735, 96 N. Y. Supp. 448; Dudley v. Abraham, 122 App. Div. 480, 107 N. Y. Supp. 97; McIntire v. White, 171 Mass. 170, 50 N. E. 524. We see no reason for holding that the case at bar should not be Placed in the same class as those using hardwood floors. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT