McIntosh v. Smiley

Decision Date07 December 1891
Citation17 S.W. 979,107 Mo. 377
PartiesMcINTOSH v. SMILEY.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Buchanan county; O. M. SPENCER, Judge.

Action commenced by attachment by George W. McIntosh against William Smiley. Case certified from the Kansas City court of appeals. Affirmed.

Jas. W. Boyd, for appellant. Casteel & Haynes, for respondent.

BRACE, J.

This case is certified here from the Kansas City court of appeals, as being in conflict with previous decisions rendered by the St. Louis court of appeals. It is reported in 32 Mo. App. 125. The conclusion reached by the Kansas City court of appeals in this case, that a bona fide sale of goods and chattels, the possession of which is not taken within a reasonable time after the sale, within the meaning of section 2505, Rev. St. 1879, is not void, as to an existing creditor at the time of the sale, if, before the institution of an attachment suit by such creditor, the vendee takes and retains actual, continuous possession of the property, and remains in possession thereof at the time of the levy of the writ in such suit upon such property, meets with our approval. The precise question, under that section of the statute, has not hitherto been passed upon by this court, but the decision of the court of appeals finds support in the rulings of this court in the following cases: Dobyns v. Meyer, 95 Mo. 132, 8 S. W. Rep. 251; Petring v. Chrisler, 90 Mo. 650, 3 S. W. Rep. 405. The judgment of the Kansas City court of appeals is affirmed. All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Harrison & Calhoun v. South Carthage Mining Co.
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 2 Junio 1902
    ...Chattel Mortgages (3 Ed.), sec. 178; Dobyns v. Meyer, 95 Mo. 132; Hewson v. Tootle, 72 Mo. 632; Petring v. Chrisler, 90 Mo. 650; McIntosh v. Smiley, 107 Mo. 377, decided by Kansas City Court of Appeals, 32 Mo.App. 125; Hord v. Harlan, 143 Mo. 469. (4) The appellate courts of this State have......
  • Barton v. Sitlington
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 12 Abril 1895
    ...Nash v. Norment, 5 Mo.App. 545; Greeley v. Reading, 74 Mo. 309; Petring v. Chrisler, 90 Mo. 649; Dobyns v. Meyer, 95 Mo. 132; McIntosh v. Smiley, 107 Mo. 377; Boland Ross, 120 Mo. 208; Howell v. Caryl, 50 Mo.App. 440. (4) No one can object to a failure to record a mortgage unless he has bee......
  • Harrison v. South Carthage Min. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 2 Junio 1902
    ... ... v. Self, 77 Mo. App. 284; Coke Co. v. Stevens, 74 Mo. App. 39). See, also, Dobyns v. Meyer, 95 Mo. 132, 8 S. W. 251, 6 Am. St. Rep. 32; McIntosh v. Smiley, 32 Mo. App. 125; Id., 107 Mo. 377, 17 S. W. 979. Our courts have proceeded on the theory that a subsequent mortgage could not possibly ... ...
  • McIntosh v. Smiley
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 7 Diciembre 1891
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT