McKay v. Consolidated American Ins. Co., Inc., 57284
| Decision Date | 24 April 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 57284,57284 |
| Citation | 149 Ga.App. 691,256 S.E.2d 93 |
| Parties | McKAY et al. v. CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Dye & Williams, William J. Williams, Augusta, for appellants.
Fulcher, Hagler, Harper & Reed, Wiley S. Obenshain, III, G. Larry Bonner, Augusta, for appellee.
This appeal is from the grant of the defendant's motion to dismiss after hearing, a suit brought against it to collect money damages under a homeowner's fire insurance policy. The ground of the motion was that the plaintiffs had ceased to be the real parties in interest in the action.
Damage to the house in question was apparently caused by interior water resulting from the freezing and rupturing of water pipes. The house had been newly purchased and was not yet occupied. Plaintiffs made demand on the defendant insurer for their loss and were denied. After suit was filed but before repairs were undertaken, the plaintiffs' mortgage company foreclosed on the house, and no confirmation or deficiency proceeding was subsequently undertaken. Held :
Assuming that the loss was covered under the policy, the plaintiffs' recovery would be limited under the terms of the policy to the cost of repair. However, the plaintiffs have expended no sums to repair the premises, and it is clear that they no longer have any interest in doing so. They have, in short, suffered no loss.
The plaintiffs contend that their entitlement to recovery vested in them at the time of the loss, making the subsequent foreclosure irrelevant. This proposition is unique in Georgia, and the plaintiffs have not guided us to any authority in support of it in other jurisdictions. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin has held that the amount of damage should be determined as of the time of loss, but Ramsdell v. Ins. Co. of No. Amer., 197 Wis. 136, 221 N.W. 654 (1928). Under the terms of the insurance contract presented here, it is specified that any loss payable would be paid to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Moore v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.
...by PBE prior to any repair, thereby extinguishing plaintiff's interest in the property. Defendant cites McKay v. Consolidated American Ins. Co., 149 Ga.App. 691, 256 S.E.2d 93 (1979), for the proposition that foreclosure of an insured's interest in property — when the amount of the insurer'......
-
Jet Air, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.
...Block and Jet Air had suffered no loss and had no right to recover under the policy as written. McKay v. Consolidated, etc., Ins. Co., 149 Ga.App. 691, 692, 256 S.E.2d 93 (1979); see National Security, etc., Co. v. Eureka Fed. Savings, etc., Assn., 188 Ga.App. 693, 373 S.E.2d 811 (1988); Ch......
-
Talman Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. American States Ins. Co.
...25 N.E.2d 603 (1940); Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Sterling, 219 Md. 217, 148 A.2d 453 (1959); and McKay v. Consolidated American Insurance Co., 149 Ga.App. 691, 256 S.E.2d 93 (1979). In each of these cases recovery by the plaintiff insureds would have smacked of unjust enrichment. Talman w......
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. McGee
...to repair, as a condition precedent to the insurer's liability. Appellant argues on the basis of the holding in McKay v. Consolidated Am. Ins. Co., 149 Ga.App. 691, 256 S.E.2d 93, that appellee's sale of the boat (prior to judgment below) eradicates his interest in the boat and precludes hi......