McKee v. State, 5 Div. 485
Decision Date | 15 December 1949 |
Docket Number | 5 Div. 485 |
Citation | 44 So.2d 781,253 Ala. 235 |
Parties | McKEE v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and Jas. T. Hardin, and Wm. N. McQueen, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the petition.
Omar L. Reynolds and Reynolds & Reynolds, of Clanton, opposed.
The defendant Dewey Arseal McKee has been twice convicted for feloniously causing the death of his wife, first for murder in the second degree and on his last trial of manslaughter in the first degree.
In the report of the appeal from the first conviction it was stated in the opinion of the court:
'Dr. Rehling gave as his opinion that Mrs. McKee had died as a result of this ruptured spleen, and that said rupture had resulted from an external blow.
On that appeal the case was reversed because of the court permitting in evidence, over the defendant's objection, the photographs made and developed by Dr. Rehling after the autopsy of the area where the deceased's body was opened, disclosing the ruptured spleen. The description of the photograph by the court on that appeal is as follows:
The court then observed:
On the last appeal it was observed: 'Timely objections were interposed to the introduction of each of the other photographic exhibits. The point is particularly stressed that as a preliminary proof to their introduction it was not show that the photographs, taken some eight days after death, accurately and correctly portrayed wounds on the body that were present at the time of decedent's death.
In other words, it is urged that for aught appearing from the evidence the various wounds and bruises depicted by the picture could have been occasioned by the handling of the body in preparation for...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson v. State
...circumstances of the particular case, and, in the absence of gross abuse, its actions are not reviewable by this court. McKee v. State, 253 Ala. 235, 44 So.2d 781 (1950)." Snipes v. State, 364 So.2d 424, 427 (Ala.Cr.App.1978). See also Jackson v. State, 516 So.2d 726 (Ala.Cr.App.1985), reve......
-
International Union, United Auto., Aircraft and Agr. Implement Workers of America, C.I.O. v. Russell, 8 Div. 751
...to portray is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reviewable except for gross abuse. McKee v. State, 253 Ala. 235, 44 So.2d 781. It is likewise a matter for the trial court in the exercise of his sound discretion to determine whether the motion picture wi......
-
Tezeno v. State
...1949), affirmed 148 Tex. 113, 221 S.W.2d 235 (1949); Nichols v. State, 267 Ala. 217, 100 So.2d 750 (1958); McKee v. State, 253 Ala. 235, 44 So.2d 781 (1949); State v. Ernst, 150 Me. 449, 114 A.2d 369 (1955); State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 41 N.W.2d 313 (1950); State v. Rogers, 233 N.C. 390......
-
Johnson v. State
...The rule relative to the admissibility of such photographs has been stated many times and need not be here repeated. McKee v. State, 253 Ala. 235, 237-238, 44 So.2d 781, 783; Hines v. State, 260 Ala. 668, 72 So.2d 296; Walker v. State, 265 Ala. 233, 90 So.2d 221; Pilley v. State, 247 Ala. 5......