McKinney v. State
| Decision Date | 26 May 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 3,No. 45335,45335,3 |
| Citation | 121 Ga.App. 815,175 S.E.2d 893 |
| Parties | Phuysley McKINNEY v. The STATE |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
L. Z. Dozier, Macon, for appellant.
Jack J. Gautier, Dist. Atty., Fred M. Hasty, Macon, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
The defendant was indicted for murder, was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and was sentenced to serve six years in the penitentiary. The appeal is from the judgment and sentence based upon errors enumerated on (1) allowing the district attorney to question members of the jury panel prior to their selection, concerning their possible prejudice toward the deceased and for excusing any jurors for that reason; (2) certain hearsay testimony allowed in evidence; (3) certain instructions submitted to the jury on conspiracy, assault and voluntary manslaughter alleged to be erroneous; (4) failure to charge on the law of involuntary manslaughter, and failing to define and give examples of felony and felonious assault in connection with the charge on justifiable homicide; and (5) that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. Held:
1. The record and transcript being incomplete concerning the questions allegedly propounded to a juror or jurors, and the reasons why any were excused, the answers to those questions not being apparent and no effort having been made under Code Ann. § 6-805(f) (Ca.L.1965, pp. 18, 24) to complete the record as to the questioning of prospective jurors before trial, the errors enumerated thereon cannot be considered and are not meritorious.
2. At the time the deceased was shot, and immediately afterthe witness heard the gunshot, he testified that the deceased cried out 'Junior, they done shot me.' These remarks, made by the deceased at the time of the shooting, would be a part of the res gestae and so connected with the alleged crime as to be admissible in evidence as a part thereof. See Code § 38-305; Southern Gas Company v. McAllum, 95 Ga.App. 525, 98 S.E.2d 397; Ayers v. State, 215 Ga. 325, 110 S.E.2d 669; Augusta Factory v. Barnes, 72 Ga. 217(5).
3. The written requests to charge being either inaccurate, inapt, incorrect, argumentative, or covered in the charge as given by the trial court, the court did not err in not giving the instructions as requested. There is no merit in the enumerations of error complaining thereof.
4. There being evidence, both direct and circumstantial, of a conspiracy to do an unlawful act, that is, the defendant and his co-defendant testified that they made an assault upon the homosexuals by shooting in their general direction, not to hurt them but to frighten them and make them run, the court was authorized to charge on conspiracy, and there is no merit in the error enumerated on this portion of the charge.
5. The enumeration as to the charge on assault is not meritorious for the same reasons stated above. See Crumbley v. State, 61 Ga. 582, 584; Hart v. State, 55 Ga.App. 85(2), 189 S.E. 547; Nelson v. State, 92 Ga.App. 738, 90 S.E.2d 38.
6. The defendant having admitted in his sworn testimony that he fired a pistol several times at the deceased to scare him but that the co-defendant shot him, the jury was entitled to believe that the appellant fired the fatal shot. The jury was not required to accept the co-defendant's testimony that he fired the fatal shot. There was also evidence of conspiracy sufficient to authorize the charge of voluntary manslaughter since the deceased was attacking the defendant at that time. If there is any doubt, however slight, as to whether the offense was that of murder or voluntary manslaughter, it is the duty of the court to submit the law of both murder and manslaughter to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bentley v. State, 48573
...of the res gestae and so connected with the alleged crime as to be admissible evidence as a part thereof. (Cits.)' McKinney v. State, 121 Ga.App. 815(2), 175 S.E.2d 893. See also Ayers v. State, 215 Ga. 325, 326, 110 S.E.2d 669, where the statement was held admissible as part of the res ges......
-
Stuart v. State, 45833
...607, 81 S.E. 802; North v. State, 69 Ga.App. 836(1), 26 S.E.2d 892; Wager v. State, 74 Ga.App. 729, 41 S.E.2d 342; McKinney v. State, 121 Ga.App. 815(6), 175 S.E.2d 893, and cases 4. The evidence here was sufficient to authorize a charge on the law of conspiracy. The mere fact that there wa......
-
Doughty v. State, 70010
...is inaccurate, inapt or incorrect, it is not error for the trial court to give the instructions as requested. McKinney v. State, 121 Ga.App. 815, 816, 175 S.E.2d 893 (1970). Furthermore, even if "good faith" would be a proper legal defense here or a credible one based upon the evidence, the......
-
Berry v. State, 45901
...Greene v. McIntyre, 119 Ga.App. 296, 297, 167 S.E.2d 203; West v. State, 120 Ga.App. 390(3), 170 S.E.2d 698; McKinney v. State, 121 Ga.App. 815(1), 175 S.E.2d 893. However, should we take the objection made as a proper recitation of what occurred, no error would be shown, as it is perfectly......