McKinnon v. CV Indus., Inc.

Decision Date06 October 2011
Docket NumberNo. 359P11.,359P11.
Citation365 N.C. 353,718 S.E.2d 376
PartiesBobby E. McKINNON v. CV INDUSTRIES, INC.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Clyde Gary Triggs, for McKinnon, Bobby E.

William L. Rikard, Jr., for CV Industries, Inc.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of August 2011 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of October 2011.”

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC v. Cnty. of Cabarrus
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • October 1, 2013
    ...495, 500 (“For a court to award specific performance, there must be a breach of a valid contract.”), disc. review denied,365 N.C. 353, 718 S.E.2d 376 (2011). Plaintiffs attached to their amended complaint the 21 November Letter—the document that they contend formed a contract between them a......
  • Boynton v. McLaurin
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 7, 2012
    ...of a material fact.” McKinnon v. CV Indus., Inc., ––– N.C.App. ––––, ––––, 713 S.E.2d 495, 503,disc. review denied,365 N.C. 353, 718 S.E.2d 376 (2011). The record contains evidence that Mr. Boynton promised to provide training and that he did provide some training. Vitality's argument at tr......
  • GZO, LLC v. LKN, Inc.
    • United States
    • Superior Court of North Carolina
    • February 6, 2020
    ... ... Premier, Inc. v. Peterson , 232 N.C.App. 601, 605, ... 755 S.E.2d 56, 59 (2014); see also McKinnon v. CV Indus., ... Inc. , 213 N.C.App. 328, 333, 713 S.E.2d 495, 500 (2011) ... ("Courts may enter summary judgment in contract disputes ... ...
  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Corneal
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 2014
    ...to prevail on a UDTPA claim. McKinnon v. CV Indus., Inc., 213 N.C.App. 328, 340, 713 S.E.2d 495, 504, disc. rev. denied, 365 N.C. 353, 718 S.E.2d 376 (2011).In Overstreet v. Brookland, Inc., the defendant promised to the plaintiff that no part of a subdivision would be used for non-resident......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT