McLymont v. A Temporary Solution
Decision Date | 22 July 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 98-1580.,98-1580. |
Citation | 738 So.2d 447 |
Parties | John McLYMONT, Appellant, v. A TEMPORARY SOLUTION, ATS West, Inc. and AGC Self-Insurers Fund, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Clark W. Berry, Ft. Myers, and Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellant.
Gerald W. Pierce, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Ft. Myers, for Appellees.
The claimant, John McLymont, appeals an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) denying authorization for dental care. The critical issue in this appeal involves whether a claimant may voluntarily dismiss one of several ripe claims included in a petition for benefits at, or just prior to, the final hearing and then later refile a petition for that claimed benefit, in this case dental care. Because we find that traditional principles of res judicata apply here and that appellant had alternatives available to him other than taking a voluntary dismissal of the dental care claim, we affirm.
Appellant had scheduled a dentist's deposition for a date just before the final hearing, but the deposition had to be canceled and could not be rescheduled prior to the hearing. The final hearing proceeded on all claims except the dental care claim, and the JCC entered a final order as to those claims, noting that appellant had voluntarily dismissed the dental care claim during, or just prior to, the hearing. When appellant subsequently refiled the dental care claim, the employer/carrier argued that the claim was ripe at the time of the original final hearing and was, therefore, waived when it was voluntarily dismissed. The JCC accepted this argument and denied the claim for dental care. We agree that, applying principles of res judicata, appellant waived the dental care claim because it was ripe at the final hearing and should have been determined at that time. See, e.g., Artigas v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 622 So.2d 1346, 1348 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
( (citations omitted)); Turner v. Rinker Materials, 622 So.2d 80, 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (); Brantley v. Allen, 538 So.2d 1338, 1339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) () ; Florida Power & Light Co. v. Haycraft, 421 So.2d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thomas v. Eckerd Drugs
...more closely aligned with Correa, than U.S. Block Windows v. Dixon, 943 So.2d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), or McLymont v. A Temporary Solution, 738 So.2d 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). In Dixon, the claimant had a merits hearing to address her claim for benefits for a right shoulder injury. Although ......
-
Scotty's Hardware, Inc. v. Northcutt, 1D03-4659.
...because the claim was not raised at the prior hearing even though ripe for adjudication at that time); McLymont v. A Temporary Solution, 738 So.2d 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (affirming denial of claim for dental care where claim was ripe for hearing at time claimant dismissed other However, in......
-
U.S. Block Windows v. Dixon, 1D05-5613.
...first merits hearing. However, this does not preclude application of res judicata to the claims at issue. See McLymont v. A Temporary Solution, 738 So.2d 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding that where claimant voluntarily dismissed a petition for benefits requesting authorization for dental ca......