McMahon v. McMahon

Decision Date10 March 1890
CitationMcMahon v. McMahon, 13 S.W. 208, 100 Mo. 97 (Mo. 1890)
PartiesMcMAHON et al. v. McMAHON et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis circuit court; JAMES A. SEDDON, Judge.

This action was brought by Thomas H. McMahon and others against Abbie McMahon and others, to set aside the will of Patrick McMahon. From a judgment for defendants establishing the will plaintiffs appealed.

R. L. McLaran, M. F. Taylor, and Julian Laughlin, for appellants. Rassieur & Schnurmacher, for respondents.

RAY, C. J.

Plaintiffs bring this action in the circuit court of St. Louis to set aside the will of Patrick McMahon, which had been admitted to probate in the probate court of said city. After the issues were made up, plaintiffs filed their motion in writing to dismiss the cause, which, coming on for hearing, the court struck said motion from the files, and, plaintiffs declining to further appear, the court heard the evidence offered by defendants in support of the will, and entered its judgment, establishing the same as the last will and testament of said McMahon. Plaintiffs afterwards filed their motion for new trial, and appealed from the court's action in overruling the same. The only question now before us by this said appeal is whether the plaintiffs had the right to dismiss the suit. This, we apprehend, is no longer an open question in this state, in view of our express decisions that, upon the issues of ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • Campbell v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 7, 1940
    ...without a judgment in solemn form probating the will or refusing to probate it. This has long been settled in this State. [McMahon v. McMahon, 100 Mo. 97, 13 S.W. 208, cases cited.] Again quoting from Braeuel v. Reuther, supra: "The purpose of the proceeding is to determine whether or not t......
  • Campbell v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 21, 1939
    ... ...           Even a ... plaintiff cannot dismiss a will contest suit after issue has ... been joined. [See McMahon v. McMahon, 100 Mo. 97, 13 ... S.W. 208; 1 Houts Mo. Pleading & Practice, sec. 330.] ...          Defendants, ... to sustain their ... ...
  • Watson v. Alderson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1898
    ...the rejection of the instrument, and this will be so whether they would have it so or not. Benoist v. Murrin, 48 Mo. 48; McMahon v. McMahon, 100 Mo. 97, 13 S.W. 208. will must go to probate or rejection whether the result will be prejudicial to their pecuniary interests or not. The right of......
  • The State ex rel. Hamilton v. Guinotte
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1900
    ...v. Murrin, supra; Harris v. Hays, 53 Mo. 90; 1 Woerner Am. L. Admin. (2 Ed.), star p. 500; Brown on Jurisdiction, sec. 64; McMahon v. McMahon, 100 Mo. 97, 13 S.W. 208.] being the sole issue joined in the circuit court it is extremely difficult to see, if a bond were required on appeal, how ......
  • Get Started for Free