McManus v. Tralles
Decision Date | 12 July 1923 |
Docket Number | No. 17888.,17888. |
Citation | 253 S.W. 406 |
Parties | MOMANUS v. TRALLES. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Franklin Ferriss, Judge.
"Not to be officially published."
Action by Thomas Ward McManus against Forest P. Tralles, executor de bonis non c. t. a. of the estate of James J. Butler, deceased. Judgment for defendant, and from an order sustaining plaintiff's motion for new trial defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions to reinstate original judgment.
George O. Durham, Forest P. Tralles, and Charles P. Williams, all of St. Louis, for appellant.
Campbell Allison and W. B. Homer, both of St. Louis, for respondent.
This action was brought in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, September 8, 1919. The suit was originally instituted against Rose Mary Butler, executrix of the estate of James J. Butler, deceased. Since the case has been brought to this court on appeal, the death of Rose Mary Butler has been suggested here, and Forest P. Tralles, having been duly appointed executor de bonis non c. t. a. of said estate, has entered his appearance in said cause and has been substituted as the party appellant and the cause revived against him as such executor.
This action is founded on the following contract:
The contract was dated May 10, 1907, and was signed by the parties thereto.
The certificate of incorporation of the Ajax Copper Mining Company was issued by the Secretary of State, July 30, 1907, and a certified copy of this certificate was filed for record in the office of the recorder of deeds of the city of St. Louis, August 19, 1907. On May 24, 1907, a quitclaim deed to the Ajax Copper Mining Company was acknowledged by Edward Butler and wife and plaintiff, before Margaret L. Samuels, a notary public. This deed was thereupon delivered by the notary to Mr. Haynes, who, she testified, was secretary of the Ajax Copper Mining Company. It is said that thereupon this deed was sent to New Mexico for record, but the evidence as to this is not clear. The deed itself was not produced, nor were its contents proved.
Afterwards, some time during the summer of 1907, a conference was had In the office of the Ajax Copper Mining Company in S. Louis in regard to the title to the mining claims of the Ajax Company. Edward Butler, E. B. Lane, the plaintiff, and James Z. Butler were present at that conference. When James J. Butler arrived at the conference, the matter of the title to the property was discussed, and Col. Edward Butler said:
There was further talk to the effect that they did not have a patent to the claims that had been put in the deed. James J. Butler said not to pay the $25,000 note; he said:
Later on they were discussing what they would do, and James J. Butler said, "Allen can take care of this." Mr. Allen, who was a practicing attorney of St. Louis, was present at the conference, representing Mr. Price, who was absent on account of illness.
It does not appear that James J. Butler ever executed his promissory note to plaintiff and Edward Butler as provided for in the contract.
Suit was brought against Edward. Butler and Thomas Ward McManus on the $25,000 promissory note provided for in the contract upon which this suit is founded when said note became due in 1908. The answer of the defendants in that suit denied liability on said note on the ground that the consideration for said note was the transfer of certain mining property in New Mexico, that the title to said property was then and there warranted, and that the title to the property for which said note was executed and delivered was defective. It does not appear who represented Edward Butler in that suit, but it was shown that Attorneys Cullen and Fauntleroy answered for McManus.
The suit on the note finally terminated in a judgment against the defendants, and said judgment was paid in 1915 by plaintiff herein and the estate of Edward Butler, who died pending the suit; each defendant paying one-half of the amount of the judgment.
In the present case the circuit court, at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence, sustained the defendant's demurrer to the evidence and gave judgment in favor of the defendant, and afterwards sustained the plaintiff's motion for a new trial on the ground of error in sustaining the demurrer to the evidence, and ordered a new trial in said cause. From this order granting a new trial the defendant appealed.
The contract sued on is unique, and distinctive precedents for its classification and. construction are not available. The respondent insists that it is an indemnity contract or agreement indemnifying respondent and Edward Butler against liability on the note executed by them for a portion of the purchase price of the mining claims purchased by them from Laughlin and Westlake, and that being such a contract or agreement fin indemnity, his right of action against appellant accrued upon payment of the judgment rendered in the suit on said note, and not until such payment, and that therefore the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the year 1915 when such payment was made. This view necessarily contemplates the performance of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Goerss v. Indemnity Co. of America
...loss by reason of payment of judgment. State ex rel. v. Trimble, 297 Mo. 659; Century Realty Co. v. Ins. Co., 179 Mo.App. 123; McManus v. Tralles, 253 S.W. 406; v. Georgia Casualty Co., 315 Mo. 1007; Mathews v. Modern Woodmen, 236 Mo. 243, 244; Strong v. Ins. Co., 62 Mo. 289; Murgic v. Fort......
-
Wehrhahn v. Ft. Dearborn Casualty Underwriters of Chicago, Ill.
... ... for loss by reason of payment of judgment. Century Realty ... Co. v. Insurance Co., 179 Mo.App. 123; McManus v ... Tralles, 253 S.W. 406; Swanson v. Georgia Casualty ... Co., 287 S.W. 455; Murgic v. Fort Dearborn Casualty ... Underwriters, 243 ... ...
-
Wehrhahn v. Dearborn Casualty Underwriters
...from reimbursement for loss by reason of payment of judgment. Century Realty Co. v. Insurance Co., 179 Mo. App. 123; McManus v. Tralles, 253 S.W. 406; Swanson v. Georgia Casualty Co., 287 S.W. 455; Murgic v. Fort Dearborn Casualty Underwriters, 243 Ill. App. 650 (certiorari denied by Suprem......