McMillen v. Blattner

Decision Date23 October 1885
Citation25 N.W. 245,67 Iowa 287
PartiesMCMILLEN v. BLATTNER ET AL
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Appeal from Mahaska District Court.

THIS action was commenced on the twenty-fourth day of July, 1884. A demurrer to the answer was overruled, and the plaintiff appeals.

AFFIRMED.

Liston McMillen, pro se.

No appearance for appellees.

OPINION

SEEVERS, J.

Appellant concedes in an able and exhaustive printed argument that the only question for determination is whether the amendment to the constitution which was ratified by the people at a special election held on the twenty-seventh day of June, 1882, was constitutionally adopted and became a part of the constitution of this state. This question was considered and determined in Koehler v. Hill, 60 Iowa 543, 14 N.W. 738. A petition for a rehearing was filed and granted. Able arguments were made on rehearing by distinguished counsel, and after mature consideration a majority of the court adhered to the conclusion reached in the original opinion, that the amendment to the constitution had not been constitutionally adopted, and therefore did not become a part of the constitution. After again considering this question, we are now content to say that we are not disposed to overrule the case cited.

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Fahey v. Hackmann
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1922
    ... ... Jones, 168 Mo. 401; Gabbert v. Ry ... Co., 171 Mo. 84, 97; Durfee v. Harper, 22 Mont ... 354; Koehler v. Hill, 60 Iowa 543; McMillen v ... Blattner, 67 Iowa 287; Bailey v. Brookhart, 113 ... Iowa 250; McCreary, Governor, v. Speer, 156 Ky. 783; ... State ex rel. v. Tooker, ... ...
  • Getty & Born v. Tramel
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • October 23, 1885

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT