McNair v. State

Decision Date26 June 1990
Docket NumberNo. 89-2372,89-2372
Citation563 So.2d 804
Parties15 Fla. L. Weekly D1691 Clifford McNAIR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Roberta G. Mandel, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court was under a misapprehension that the language of section 775.084(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), was mandatory and not permissive, see State v. Brown, 530 So.2d 51 (Fla.1988), we nonetheless affirm the sentence under review; the sentence imposed falls within the sentencing guidelines, does not exceed the enhanced statutory maximum penalty for the crime, and therefore does not constitute an abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 12 février 1991
    ...be imposed upon habitual felony offender, is not mandatory); State v. Padron, 571 So.2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (same); McNair v. State, 563 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (same). But see Donald v. State, 562 So.2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (opposite result as to § 775.084(4)(b); State v. Brown,......
  • Isom v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 mai 1993
    ...(quoting Smith v. State, 574 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)); see also State v. Brown, 530 So.2d 51, 53 (Fla.1988); McNair v. State, 563 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Defendant also argues, and the State concedes, that this case is controlled by the version of the habitual offender statute i......
  • Miller v. State, s. 91-1743
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 15 février 1995
    ...So.2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), approved, 595 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992); State v. Padron, 571 So.2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); McNair v. State, 563 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); see also Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 82 S.Ct. 501, 7 L.Ed.2d 446 (1962); Barber v. State, 564 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA), ......
  • Henry v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 11 juin 1991
    ...775.084(4)(a), is permissive, not mandatory. State v. Brown, 530 So.2d 51, 53 (Fla.1988) (construing 1985 statute); McNair v. State, 563 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (1987 statute). 3 As was true in Smith v. State, 574 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), we are "uncertain as to whether the court......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT