McNeill v. Park County School Dist. No. 1, s. 5501

Decision Date06 November 1981
Docket Number5502,Nos. 5501,s. 5501
Parties25 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 366 Bob G. McNEILL, Appellant (Claimant-Appellee), v. PARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, Appellee (Defendant-Appellant). Dorothy O. McNEILL, Appellant (Claimant-Appellee), v. PARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, Appellee (Defendant-Appellant).
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

James M. Guill, Goppert, Day & Olson, Cody, for appellants.

Ross D. Copenhaver (argued), and Tracy J. Copenhaver, Legal Intern, Copenhaver & Kahl, Powell, for appellee.

Before ROSE, C. J., and RAPER, THOMAS, ROONEY and BROWN, JJ.

RAPER, Justice.

This appeal arises from a district court's reversal of a decision by the Commissioner of the Wyoming State Department of Labor and Statistics. The commissioner's decision was in the appellants' favor and declared the appellee wrongfully witheld wages. Appellee was ordered by the commissioner to pay appellants wages they claimed due under their employment contracts. The district court reversed partly on the basis that the Labor Commissioner had misconstrued Wyoming law and partly because he had exceeded his jurisdiction. Appellants contend that the district court's action was erroneous for the following reasons:

"1. The (appellants were) not obligated to teach for the School District under a contract for the 1979-1980 school year.

"2. The resignation of Appellant in June of 1979 should have been accepted by the School District at that time, as it was reasonable notice of Appellant's anticipatory repudiation of his employment relationship, rather than wait to dismiss Appellant in September and increase his damages.

"3. The wage offset of $300.00 taken out of Appellant's last paycheck for his 1978-1979 employment contract was invalid and illegal, and the Commissioner of Labor's findings and order to that effect were not arbitrary, capricious, or unsupported by substantial evidence."

However, the real issue here concerns the scope of the Commissioner of the Department of Labor and Statistics' jurisdiction.

We will affirm.

Appellant Bob G. McNeill was employed as a teacher by the appellee continuously from 1966 until 1979. He was a continuing contract teacher under the definition of that term appearing in § 21-7-102(a)(ii), W.S.1977; 1 and therefore under § 21-7-106, W.S.1977 2 he could not be terminated at the end of a school year unless so notified before March 15, prior to the school year's end. In light of § 21-7-104, W.S.1977 3 it is apparent that a school district's failure to terminate by March 15 constitutes a renewal of the teacher's contract. And thus under state law, since appellee failed to send notice to Bob McNeill on or prior to March 15, 1979, there was a renewal of his teaching contract for the 1979-1980 school year. However it is appellants' contention that appellee's school board policy No. 532.27 superseded state law. This policy provided:

"Every employment contract for the performance of certificated services for the school district shall be in writing and in duplicate. The contract provides for the payment of an annual salary, payable in regular installments during the year."

Accordingly appellants argue that since the contract was not in writing, there was no contract.

Appellant Dorothy O. McNeill taught in the appellee's school district during the 1977-1978 and 1978-1979 school years. She was an initial contract teacher as that term is defined in § 21-7-102(a)(iv), W.S.1977. 4 Under § 21-7-105, W.S.1977 5 an initial contract teacher must be hired on an annual basis and provided notice of termination by March 15 of each year. On March 14, 1979, Dorothy McNeill was offered a contract for the 1979-1980 school year. On May 4, 1979, she was advised of her teaching assignment for that year.

Under § 21-7-107, W.S.1977, 6 any teacher desiring to resign must give notice of that intent prior to April 15. Neither of the McNeills gave any notice of their desire to leave their positions until early July of 1979. At that time they sent the following letter:

"Bob & Dorothy McNeill

" 1221 White Hall

" University Station

" Laramie, WY. 82071

"Mr. Don Hillman, Chairman,

Trustees School Dist. One

Powell, Wyoming 82435

"Dear sir;

"We have just learned from the pages of The Powell Tribune that the Board has elected to ignore the grievances filed by the staff concerning placement upon the salary schedule. Also it is noted that there does not seem to be much change in the negotiations format established last year.

"These issues, in addition to differences that exist between what we feel education should provide for students and what appears to be the direction Powell Schools is heading, cause us to believe it to be in the best interest of Powell students that we terminate our employment at this time. To continue with such marked differences would likely work hardships upon us and the District and most surely it would have impact upon students. This we feel should be avoided if at all possible.

"So, with a very real feeling of regret, we tender an opportunity for the District to accept our resignations effective immediately, provided they are accepted without penalty and or prejudice.

"Sincerely,

"/s/ Bob G. McNeill

Bob G. McNeill

"/s/ Dorothy O. McNeill

Dorothy O. McNeill"

"cc: Board Members

"cc: Ed Heiser

Appellee did not accept the tendered resignations. In February 1979, appellee had adopted a policy which provided in essence that any teacher released from a contract after June 1, and prior to July 15, would pay $200.00 for the estimated cost of replacement. After July 15 appellee would be due $300.00. Appellee's position was that the McNeills' tendered resignations were conditioned upon a release from the obligation. Since appellee was not willing to agree to such a release, it viewed the resignations ineffective. When the appellants failed to report to their jobs in August, appellee withheld $300.00 from the final payment due to each under the previous year's contract and initiated dismissal proceedings.

On October 17, 1979, appellants filed claims with the Department of Labor and Statistics for the monies withheld by appellee. The Department of Labor and Statistics' proceedings culminated with the commissioner of that department ordering appellee to pay each appellant the $300.00 in question. Appellee appealed to district court where the commissioner's order was reversed.

The scope of the Commissioner of Labor and Statistics' jurisdiction is defined in § 27-2-104, W.S.1977, which provides:

"It shall be the duty of the commissioner of labor and statistics to enforce all laws enacted by the legislature of Wyoming, relating to labor, hours of labor, and to the health, welfare, life and limb of the workers of this state; to see that workers are protected in the collection of their wages lawfully due; to make such inspections as may be by him deemed necessary of the industrial establishments and buildings hereinafter provided for; to make an inspection of all living accommodations provided employees whereever employed, where such are furnished as a part of the wages, and he shall, as required by section 9-21 (§ 9-2-103) of the statutes, report to the governor, together with such recommendations thereon as he deems appropriate." (Emphasis added.)

The general rule is that only those powers expressly conferred are granted to an administrative agency. Continental Pipe Line Co. v. Belle Fourche Pipeline Co., 372 F.Supp. 1333 (D.C.Wyo.1974). The commissioner's power includes only assisting workers in obtaining collection of lawfully due wages. The grant of power to the commissioner does not include jurisdiction to decide what wages are lawfully due in a disputed matter and override a contract of employment.

The statutory scheme can be more clearly seen in §§ 27-4-104 and -105, W.S.1977. Section 27-4-104 provides:

"(a) Whenever an employee quits the service or is discharged therefrom, such employee shall be paid, whatever wages are due him or her, in lawful...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow Committee
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • September 22, 1982
    ...it is clear that an administrative officer has only those powers expressly conferred by the legislature. McNeill v. Park County School District No. 1, Wyo., 635 P.2d 818 (1981). Here, the statutes in question grant the Secretary of State only the power to canvass properly filed and verified......
  • Brasel & Sims Const. Co., Inc. v. State Highway Com'n of Wyoming
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1982
    ...rule is that only those powers expressly conferred by the legislature are granted to an administrative agency. McNeill v. Park County School Dist. No. 1, Wyo., 635 P.2d 818 (1981); Tri-County Electric Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Gillette, Wyo., 525 P.2d 3 (1974); Bruegman v. Johnson Ranches, Inc......
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Wyoming Ins. Dept.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • May 31, 1990
    ...rule adaptation where express authority has previously been required by our strict construction precedent. McNeill v. Park County School Dist. No. 1, 635 P.2d 818 (Wyo.1981); Tri-County Elec. Ass'n, Inc., 525 P.2d at 9. Consequently, the statutory citation by the majority is erroneous in tw......
  • City of Evanston v. Griffith
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1986
    ...is that only those powers expressly conferred by the legislature are granted to an administrative agency. McNeil v. Park County School District No. 1, Wyo., 635 P.2d at 818 (1981); Tri-County Electric Association, Inc. v. City of Gillette, Wyo., 525 P.2d 3 (1974); Bruegman v. Johnson Ranche......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT