McPherson v. Morrisette, 27
| Decision Date | 29 February 1956 |
| Docket Number | No. 27,27 |
| Citation | 91 S.E.2d 574,243 N.C. 626 |
| Parties | Lydia S. McPHERSON v. Mary Frances MORRISETTE and Lucian Morrisette, defendants, and F. T. Horner, Administrator of the Estate of O. E. McPherson, Intervenor |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
LeRoy & Goodwin, Elizabeth City, for defendants appellants.
John H. Hall, Elizabeth City, for intervenor appellee.
This appeal, as in the case of Burgess v. Trevathan, 236 N.C. 157, 72 S.E. 2d 231, 232, falls under the ban of 'the general rule that ordinarily an order allowing a motion for the joinder of an additional party is not appealable.' In consequence, it must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Corbett v. Corbett
...The ruling of the court below did not impair any substantial right of the plaintiffs which would warrant an appeal. McPherson v. Morrisette, 243 N.C. 626, 91 S.E.2d 574; Burgess v. Trevathan, supra; City of Shelby v. Lackey, 235 N.C. 343, 69 S.E.2d 607; Horne v. Horne, 205 N.C. 309, 171 S.E......
-
Wood v. City of Fayetteville
...of Education, 258 N.C. 381, 128 S.E.2d 785 (1963); Burgess v. Trevathan, 236 N.C. 157, 72 S.E.2d 231 (1952); McPherson v. Morrisette, 243 N.C. 626, 91 S.E.2d 574 (1956) (per curiam); Annot., 15 A.L.R.2d 336 (1951). The rule applies with equal vigor without regard to whether the trial court ......