McPherson v. State

Decision Date22 November 1890
Citation15 S.W. 174
PartiesMcPHERSON v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Appeal from district court, Van Zandt county; F. J. McCORD, Judge.

Kearby & Greer, for appellant. Asst. Atty. Gen. Davidson, for the State.

WILLSON, J.

It is made to appear by two bills of exception in this record that counsel for the state, in his argument to the jury, alluded to and commented upon the failure of the defendant to testify in his own behalf in the cause. This was manifest error, for which the trial judge should have set aside the conviction, thereby avoiding the delay, expense, and trouble of this appeal. Hunt's Case, 28 Tex. App. 149, 12 S. W. Rep. 737. The error is confessed by the assistant attorney general, and because of said error the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State v. Devine
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • July 1, 1892
    ...35 id. 554; McFadden v. The State, 28 Tex.App. 241; Sutton v. Commonwealth, 85 Va. 128; People v. Doyle, 12 N.Y. 836; McPherson v. The State, 15 S.W. 174 (Tex.); Price v. Commonwealth, 77 Va. 393; Showalter v. The State, 84 Ind. 562; 78 Me. 490; The State v. Martin, 74 Mo. 547; The State v.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT