McPherson v. The State. Wallace Robinson
Decision Date | 31 August 1869 |
Citation | 3 W.Va. 564 |
Parties | Joel McPherson v. The State.Wallace Robinson v. Idem.Alexander Walker v. Idem.George II. Lewis v. Idem. |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
An office holder in this State cannot be removed, because his name has been stricken from the list of registered voters, when he was, at the time of his election and induction into office, a qualified and registered voter, for that cause alone.
The rules in these cases were awarded in the court below, as appears by the record, on the motion of the prosecuting attorney of the county, but the cases were proceeded on in this court in the name of the State.
The opinion of the judge contains a sufficient statement of the point involved.
Sperry and Richardson for the plaintiffs in error. Attorney General Caldwell, and Stanton Allison for the State,
These are four separate causes brought here on writs of supersedeas from judgments of the circuit court of Greenbrier county. As the causes all involved the same question, and have been argued together, I shall consider them together. McPherson was the clerk of the circuit court, Robinson the sheriff, and Lewis the recorder of said county, and Walker the supervisor of one of the townships thereof.
Proceedings were instituted against these parties to remove them from their respective offices, because their names had been, after they were respectively elected, struck from the lists of registered voters of said county.
The proceedings were upon rules, all of which are the same, except as to the name of the parties, and the offices held by them respectively.
Here is the one against McPherson as a sample of the whole:
The parties respectively...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Shackleford v. McElhinney
...Co. v. Flynn, 38 Mo. 483; Lutz v. Insurance Co, 8 Mo.App. 363; In re Flukes, 157 Mo. 125; Gladney v. Lydnor, 172 Mo. 318; McPherson v. State, 3 W.Va. 564. (4) The law is void in toto, because it is special legislation. Constitution, art. 6, secs. 1, 35; art. 4, sec. 53, par. 32; art. 6, sec......
-
State v. McElhinney
...380; State v. Gebhardt, 87 Mo. App. 542; In re Flukes, 157 Mo. 125, 130, 57 S. W. 545, 51 L. R. A. 176, 80 Am. St. Rep. 619; McPherson v. State, 3 W. Va. 564; Phares v. State, 3 W. Va. 567, 100 Am. Dec. 777; Ex parte Burr, 9 Wheat. 529, 530, 6 L. Ed. 152; Wammack v. Halloway, 2 Ala. 31, 33;......
-
Layne v. Hayes, 10739
...office removes the only impediment to his office; and that no order of this Court is necessary to restore him to the office. See McPherson v. State, 3 W.Va. 564. The right to a public office, however, of a person who is duly qualified to hold such office and who has been duly elected or app......