McPike v. St. Louis County Bank, 26970.
Decision Date | 19 April 1946 |
Docket Number | No. 26970.,26970. |
Citation | 193 S.W.2d 962 |
Parties | McPIKE v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY BANK. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Louis County; John Witthaus, Judge.
"Not to be reported in State Reports."
Action by May McPike against the St. Louis County Bank. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. On motion by defendant for special order permitting the filing of a notice of appeal.
Motion denied.
George F. Heege, of Clayton, for appellant.
Hay & Flanagan, S. D. Flanagan, and C. Delitala, all of St. Louis, for respondent.
We are handing down simultaneously herewith an opinion in this case, 193 S.W. 2d 961, sustaining a motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal. This is a motion by the defendant seeking a special order under Section 130, Civil Code of Missouri, Laws 1943, p. 391, Mo.R.S.A. § 847.130 permitting the filing of a notice of appeal, and was filed while respondent's motion to dismiss was pending. This motion might well have been taken as an admission by defendant that the notice of appeal as filed was not effective, else there would be no occasion for filing a second notice of appeal. However, we are measuring defendant's position by the application of the statute rather than on technical grounds, and are giving our views on both respondent's motion to dismiss, and now on defendant's motion for a special order.
Section 130 of the Civil Code provides:
* * *"
An appeal being unknown to the common law and purely a statutory right, the litigant must bring himself within the terms of the statute in order to avail himself of the right of appeal. In order that there be at some place an end to litigation, the legislature has wisely provided the time within which a judgment becomes final and the time within which an appeal may be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
... ... Terminal R. Assn. of St ... Louis, 340 Mo. 868, 102 S.W.2d 915. Marczuk v. St ... Louis ... such right. McPike v. St. Louis County Bank, 193 ... S.W.2d 962. (3) An ... ...
-
Tucker v. Miller
...an appeal as provided by this code.' Sec. 506.060-2(2); McPike v. St. Louis Union County Bank, Mo.App., 193 S.W.2d 961; and Mo.App., 193 S.W.2d 962. This is not a case where the notice of appeal was refiled within ten days after or wherein a special order for filing the notice of appeal was......
-
State v. Lindner
...576(3) (Mo.App.1949).' See also: State v. Gullett, supra; State v. Morrow, 316 S.W.2d 527, 529(3) (Mo.1958); McPike v. St. Louis County Bank, 193 S.W.2d 962, 963(3) (Mo.App.1946); Asher v. Thomas, 360 S.W.2d 957, 958 Rule 28.07 4 recognizes that instances may arise in which the losing party......
-
Franklin v. Franklin, 23116
...ignore or brush aside the total failure to take the procedural action necessary to vest it with jurisdiction. See McPike v. St. Louis County Bank, Mo.App., 193 S.W.2d 962. For those concerned about the welfare of these two boys, as we are, a careful consideration of the entire transcript in......